July 11, 2012 (#1126)
ALAN WATT
"CUTTING THROUGH THE MATRIX"
LIVE ON RBN
Poem Copyright Alan Watt July 11, 2012:
24/7 It's On the Go, Non-Reality of TV Show:
"Are You Easily Fooled,
Brain Paralysed?
When Media Flows Words Before Your Eyes,
Psycholinguistics Tends to Mould the Mind,
Creating Uniformity of the Desired Kind,
Marketers are Specialists in Public Relations,
Can Spin Horrors into Pleasant Sensations,
They Script-write for Politicos, All a Show,
Nothing's Real on TV the Few Wise Know"
© Alan Watt July 11, 2012
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt – July 11, 2012 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes and Callers' Comments)
| cuttingthroughthematrix.com alternate sites: cuttingthroughthematrix.net , .us , .ca alanwattcuttingthroughthematrix.ca |
mirror site: cuttingthrough.jenkness.com |
| European site includes all audios & downloadable
TRANSCRIPTS in European languages for print up: alanwattsentientsentinel.eu | |
|
Information for purchasing Alan’s books, CDs, DVDs and DONATIONS: Canada and America: PayPal, Cash, personal checks & Outside the Americas: PayPal, Cash, Western Union and Money Gram PayPal Orders: USE THE DONATE BUTTON ON THE WEBSITE – AND – Click the link below for your location (ordering info): |
Hi folks. I'm Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through the Matrix on the 11th of July, 2012.
I always suggest newcomers make good use of the website cuttingthroughthematrix.com because you’ll find over a thousand audios for free download where I take you through the journey of the system from its beginnings really, at least its beginnings that it first advertised to the general public a hundred years ago, they got together, you know the rich men of the world basically, the international moneylenders, and how they got together. They already owned corporations and they thought they’d take over the world basically and make it the way it should be made, not the way it was, sort of willy-nilly, all haphazard. They thought a planned society across the planet would suit them best, for their own interests of course, and they’ve been working steadily at it ever since. And that came out from the writings of the Royal Institute of International Affairs and the Council on Foreign Relations, the organizations that have branches across the whole planet in every country that put in prime ministers that have got to be members and presidents too. They’ve done it for a hundred years now, so literally this organization is the most powerful one on the planet. Every newspaper reporter of any worth at all is a member of it. And it’s the same with television announcers, etcetera. Lots of guys in academia are on board with it too, to get this world agenda through, which they say is going to bring us peace and all the rest of it. But in reality it’s going to be an authoritarian society because their own think tank, which is the Club of Rome, says so, that they can’t use democracy, they’ll certainly use the name democracy to steamroll other countries into submitting, but once it’s all done you’ll find you’re all under the same authoritarian structure.
So, help yourself to the audios, find out about it, find out about the books to get and buy and peruse because these guys do like to boast about their parts they’ve played over the last hundred years, when they retire generally and put out their biographies and that’s how you learn about the big agenda. And really it’s so incredibly huge it staggers the mind, the financing behind it, the thousands of think tanks they own that guides all media. They own the media of course. And it’s no surprise that we’re all going down the same track across the world. And we’re being standardized, all cultures are being standardized into the same indoctrinations.
Remember too you are the audience that bring me to you, because I don’t bring on advertisers as guests that scare you and then sell you the antidote. So it’s up to you if you want to hear this kind of stuff to keep me going by buying the books and discs at cuttingthroughthematrix.com. And you can donate as well. And from the U.S. to Canada remember personal checks are good, as are international postal money orders from the post office, you can send cash, and you can use PayPal. Across the world, Western Union, Money Gram, and PayPal once again. Remember straight donations are really, really seriously welcome at this time.
But that’s the thing, everyone is stuck in their little world. We have a little world, a little bubble that everyone lives in, and we like routines as well, we like to come home and do the same kind of things or see the same kind of things on television, and because of that we are so easily, incredibly easily, managed. When we come home from work we don’t want to listen to serious stuff, we want something that’s going to help us zonk out basically from the rotten day we’ve had doing a pretty useless and pathetic job of some kind or another. And while that’s all happening the big foundations, the foundations that put out trillions of dollars a year across the world to nongovernmental organizations, are constantly at work, night and day with their think tanks shaping the course of the world. Because you think, and you’re taught to think by the media which again the CFR owns, you’re taught to think that things just develop by themselves with a crisis coming along and the government deals with it on the spot. Nothing is further from the truth. You’re living through a planned society, a planned system, where even the wars that are happening right now were planned forty, fifty, sixty years ago.
Back with more after this break.
{Break ♫}
Hi folks, we’re back Cutting Through the Matrix. I’ve gone on about the system so long and the decline of course, actually it’s a nose-dive we’re in right now, a nose-dive to the bottom of what culture can possibly end up being and how it’s all planned that way. It’s planned that way. People don’t realize that when you grow up, well actually when you’re born and then you start growing, everything is geared right at you, there’s whole marketing divisions aimed at every age group from 3 years old, with cartoons and PC things inserted into the cartoons which the companies get paid for doing that, the same with novels for children. And we live in constant indoctrination; we’re under it all the time. And once you get to school of course, school is the biggest indoctrinator of all because without the indoctrination at school you won’t be able to take on, as they say, subsequent propaganda as you grow older. And so you must get a good indoctrination at school or it won’t take basically afterwards.
Those at the top use marketing all the time, massive marketing, and marketing companies that understand neurolinguistics, psycholinguistics, how to bend anything into something that sounds nice, or even irrelevant at times. We read the articles all the time, where in actual fact we should be kind of horrified when we actually understand what they’re saying. It’s like the same terms that the military use as well, Smart Bombs for instance. What’s smart about blowing people up with a bomb? And things like that. But it works on your mind because it softens the reality of the impact of the story and that happens all the time. So much so, they can actually guide you to go along with big movements and join them in fact, or even put your name down to protest something. It’s so easy to get you on board with the big world agenda without you even understanding how it’s done.
The communists were fantastic at this because they were run by the same globalists and they had so many front groups out there, even Christian front groups that signed on, especially petitions and so on. And before you knew it those Christian organizations were then under the microscope of the FBI. And they were still clueless that they were involved in something for communism. So it’s the same thing with the terminology that’s used today. And I was thinking of that today because this article here touches on some of the things as well. It says:
"Melinda Gates Talks Eugenics"
"This July,"
Alan: I guess it’s Britain.
"…is celebrating the centennial anniversary of London's First International Eugenics Conference of 1912."
Alan: That was the first open conference they had. Before that it was all in their old boy’s clubs and they’d chat about the inferior types, but then they had the open one at the first international eugenics conference. It says:
"One century later, on July 11, 2012, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (the largest private foundation in the world) and the British government will co-host a new London conference on eugenics with global coalition partners such as American abortion chain Planned Parenthood, British abortion chain Marie Stopes International, and the United Nations Populations Fund (UNFPA). The only difference is that the July 2012 London conference will never acknowledge that eugenics is its driving idea. Melinda Gates has claimed that the conference, which is officially dedicated to “delivering more modern family planning tools to more women in the world's poorest countries,” should involve “no controversy.” But what is eugenics and what has forced it to go incognito over the last century? Eugenics is the infamous idea that governments should decide which kinds of citizens ought to be considered desirable (the 1912 consensus was that these tended to be white, athletic, intelligent, and wealthy) and which kinds of citizens ought to be considered undesirable (these tended to be black, Jewish,…"
Alan: Actually if you read H.G. Wells, he added the Jews into the superior type, so they had different ideas on it.
"…disabled, or poor) and employ the power of the state to encourage increases of desirable citizens (positive eugenics) and encourage decreases of undesirable citizens (negative eugenics). The founder of eugenics, Sir Francis Galton, a half-cousin of Charles Darwin, formulated the idea that the protection afforded by civil society had prevented the kind of natural selection occurring in Darwin's Origin of Species from happening in humans, thus perpetuating the existence of weak and feeble-minded people who would have been unable to survive in the state of nature. Eugenicists differed on whether eugenics should be practiced in a soft manner, with taxpayer-underwritten incentives, or in a hard manner, using coercive and often deadly force. The movement claimed many adherents. Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger and her British counterpart Marie Stopes were both involved in their national eugenic societies. Margaret Sanger viewed her activism as a way to “assist the race towards the elimination of the unfit.”"
Alan: Sanger also idolized both Stalin and Hitler.
"Marie Stopes lobbied for “the sterilization of those totally unfit for parenthood to be made an immediate possibility, indeed made compulsory.”"
Alan: She wanted compulsory sterilization.
"The public appetite for open eugenics greatly waned after the fall of Nazi Germany… "
Alan: Because Germany was copying America at the time that was sterilizing people.
"…and the Nazis' attempt to use eugenic justifications for the Holocaust at the Nuremberg Trials. Unfortunately, the idea lives on. Melinda Gates, wife of Microsoft founder Bill Gates, said recently, “Government leaders ... are now beginning to understand that providing access to contraceptives is a cost-effective way to foster economic growth ... Governments should provide all women with access to family planning tools that are safe and effective and meet the needs of all women.” This is a succinct summary of soft negative eugenics: for economic reasons governments should use taxpayer dollars to underwrite the decisions of citizens to pursue recreational sexual activity. The underlying economic assumption is that the prospective children of the poor citizens likely to utilize such government-funded programs would be likely to hamper economic growth if they are born. However, the "no controversy" mantra on the soft eugenics push has been complicated by the fact that hard eugenics has recently been making resurgent splashes in the news. China's One Child Forced Abortion Policy has been highlighted by the heroic escape of Chen Guangcheng, a blind dissident sentenced to four years in prison by the Communist government for exposing the brutality of its forced-abortion policy, to the US embassy. Governor Romney has made the One-Child Policy an issue on the campaign trail by vowing to discontinue funding to the United Nations Population Fund,…"
Alan: Which he won’t of course.
"…which the Obama Administration has helped finance in spite of its support of the One-Child Policy."
Alan: They’re all the same, they won’t change it.
"The Guardian Newspaper has exposed the fact that the British government has spent millions of pounds funding a policy of forced sterilization of the poor in India as part of an effort to reduce human population to help combat climate change."
Alan: What a great excuse, eh? We’ll just kill them all because of climate change. Yep. So anyway it says:
"The governments of China and India -- underwritten by American and British tax dollars -- practice hard eugenics, coercive measures undertaken by governments to decrease citizen population. The exposure of support for hard eugenics causes denial and backtracking. UNFPA claims to support “voluntary family planning” in China. They assume that women who know that conceiving a second child will result in a forced abortion have the liberty to be “voluntary.” The British government claims its support of forcible sterilization is “about to change.” Hard eugenics is the ideology that dare not speak its name. But soft eugenics is based on the same disturbing belief -- that government should spend its resources to prevent the propagation of those whom the government believes to be detrimental to society and economic growth."
Alan: And eugenics really is a big, big major topic and all peoples across the planet. And another thing I wanted to touch on tonight too is to do with fracking. Fracking of course that’s basically going to get gas from under the earth, and the amount of water plus chemicals they pump down there trying to fracture, at high pressure, fracture, the different veins to let the gas out and maybe the damage it does. And this article here I don’t know if it’s a handout by those who do the fracking because it certainly doesn’t answer any questions.
It says:
"Can fracking pollute water? Study tries to answer"
And it says:
"A new study being done by the Department of Energy may provide some of the first solid answers to a controversial question: Can gas drilling fluids migrate and pose a threat to drinking water?"
Alan: Because they’re doing it all over the U.S.
"A drilling company in southwestern Pennsylvania is giving researchers access to a commercial drilling site, said Richard Hammack, a spokesman for the National Energy Technology Laboratory in Pittsburgh. The firm let scientists conduct baseline tests, allowed tracing elements to be added to hydraulic fracturing fluids and agreed to allow follow-up monitoring. That should let scientists see whether the drilling fluids move upwards or sideways from the Marcellus Shale, which is 8,100 feet deep at that spot."
It says:
"“It's like the perfect laboratory,” Hammack said. Hammack said he believes this is the first time such research has been done on a commercial gas well. “Conceptually, it sounds like a really great idea,” said P. Lee Ferguson, a Duke University civil and environmental engineering professor who is not involved with the project. “I have wondered about this since I started thinking about fracking. Which compounds are mobile and which aren't?” The Marcellus Shale is a gas-rich rock formation thousands of feet under large parts of Pennsylvania, New York, Ohio and West Virginia. Over the past five years, advances in drilling technology made the gas accessible, leading to a boom in production, jobs, and profits — and concerns about pollution. The gas is pulled from the ground through a process called hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, in which large volumes of water, plus sand and chemicals, are injected deep underground to break shale apart and free the gas."
Alan: Well, the whole thing is, does this stuff get into the water supply? Well of course it does because water is constantly flowing. And tonight I’ll put up a link to the government report, it’s a pdf actually, where they actually list all, it’s very rare to get this but it eventually came my way and it’s got all the chemicals which they use in the fracking and it’s enough to make your hair stand on end when you see them because it’s got xylene and toluene and a whole bunch of really nasty cancer causing chemicals in there. Never mind being volatile as well. But it’s very, very scary to see all the stuff that’s put in there. I’ll put this up tonight, all the links to this tonight at cuttingthroughthematrix.com and I think that might answer your questions for you, never mind the article that I just read. And that’s the music coming in so I’ll be back with more after this break.
{Break ♫}
Hi folks, we’re back Cutting Through the Matrix and talking about all these different articles, that mainstream dishes out for us mind you. Some of them we’re meant to know. It’s meant to make us scared and you conform through fear basically. It’s an old, old technique that you conform through fear. And so they put these articles out to make you even more afraid and more subservient and obedient. That’s why these articles, like this following one, are put out to the general public.
"Hidden Government Scanners Will Instantly Know Everything About You From 164 Feet Away"
"Within the next year or two, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security will instantly know everything about your body, clothes, and luggage with a new laser-based molecular scanner fired from 164 feet (50 meters) away. From traces of drugs or gun powder on your clothes to what you had for breakfast to the adrenaline level in your body—agents will be able to get any information they want without even touching you. And without you knowing it. The technology is so incredibly effective that, in November 2011, its inventors were subcontracted by In-Q-Tel to work with the US Department of Homeland Security. In-Q-Tel is a company founded “in February 1999 by a group of private citizens at the request of the Director of the CIA and with the support of the U.S. Congress.” According to In-Q-Tel, they are the bridge between the Agency and new technology companies. Their plan is to install this molecular-level scanning in airports…"
Alan: It can scan at the molecular level.
"...and border crossings all across the United States. The official, stated goal of this arrangement is to be able to quickly identify explosives, dangerous chemicals, or bioweapons at a distance. The machine is ten million times faster—and one million times more sensitive—than any currently available system. That means that it can be used systematically on everyone passing through airport security, not just suspect or randomly sampled people."
Alan: Well why would they have to strip-search you as well in that case?
"Analyzing everything in real time. But the machine can sniff out a lot more than just explosives, chemicals and bioweapons. The company that invented it, Genia Photonics, says that its laser scanner technology is able to “penetrate clothing and many other organic materials and offers spectroscopic information, especially for materials that impact safety such as explosives and pharmacological substances.” Formed in Montreal in 2009 by PhDs with specialties in lasers and fiber optics, Genia Photonics has 30 patents on this technology, claiming incredible biomedical and industrial applications—from identifying individual cancer cells in a real-time scan of a patient, to detecting trace amounts of harmful chemicals in sensitive manufacturing processes. Hidden government scanners will instantly know everything about you."
"Meanwhile, In-Q-Tel states that “an important benefit of Genia Photonics' implementation as compared to existing solutions is that the entire synchronized laser system is comprised in a single, robust and alignment-free unit that may be easily transported for use in many environments… This compact and robust laser has the ability to rapidly sweep wavelengths in any pattern and sequence.”"
"So not only can they scan everyone. They would be able to do it everywhere: the subway, a traffic light, sports events... everywhere."
Alan: And then it goes on to tell you how it works, for those who are just crazy about science. Science will bring us all into the grave the way it’s going. And it certainly is not making life easier for people. It’s making a lot of money for people in the industry certainly but it’s making life more of a horror show for all of us, there’s no doubt about it, along with the policies of course of the globalists.
Now India, massive market there for pharmacology, as everyone can imagine. Big pharma has been trying to get them to sign on because big pharma has got the U.S. government to sign on for all the various drugs for years and years and years. The same with Britain, through the National Health Service and it’s a great way to do business when the governments say okay we’ll take orders for this particular drug or vaccine for the next ten, twenty years, all these orders in advance. That’s why they like governments you see. Anyway India is refusing to bow down to big pharma.
"India Refuses to Bow Down to Big Pharma"
"In a stunning move, India is in the process of implementing a policy to deliver low-cost medicinal products to their citizens. Unlike most developed countries who grant exclusive rights to market medicines and biologics, India allows the generic low-cost reproduction and distribution of any patented medicine."
"The Indian government is finalizing a plan to give out billions of pounds worth of essential medicines to patients in government-run hospitals and clinics – the biggest scheme of its kind in history. The landmark project would be another massive blow to Western pharmaceutical giants who are already struggling to find a foothold in the world’s second most populous country."
Alan: Well they’ll have to bribe the officials at the top like they do everywhere else and get it passed in law that they’ve got to use the other ones, which they’ll probably do.
"The West’s big pharmaceutical firms – or “big pharma” – has long been thwarted on the sub-continent where the authorities freely allow generic drug companies to manufacture cheap copies of patented medicines. Doctors will be ordered to only use generic drugs in the programme, which is expected to be approved in the next couple of months. If a doctor prescribes a branded medicine they will face a hefty fine. Analysts believe the policy will cause the big pharmaceutical companies to rethink their emerging markets strategy."
Alan: And it goes on a bit further too for those that want to read it. It’s interesting that, I mean give them time, believe you me, give them time and enough bribery and India’s always been open for bribery, you’ll find government will change their policies.
And this article too I’ll put up tonight, it’s also about one of the, you understand everything on television has an alternative purpose, alternative motives for being on there. It’s either to indoctrinate you or it’s to get you to do something or behave in a certain way. It’s very good at getting behavior changes and behavior modification and predictive programming for things to come so you will accept things. But also it’s to do with people you’re taught to believe in and I’ll talk about one of these characters when I come back and how he’s been conning the public. Back after this break.
{Break ♫ - You’re listening to the Republic Broadcasting Network because you can handle the truth - ♫}
Hi folks, we’re back Cutting Through the Matrix, talking about television and how you have to check out the hosts because they often, especially the ones who are doctors and specialists and this and that or the other, but they’re actually really paid advertisers in a sense. This article’s about one of them.
"Celebrity addiction specialist Dr. Drew Pinsky is under fire for helping market an antidepressant for uses not approved by the Food and Drug Administration. GlaxoSmithKline,"
Alan: Oh, them again.
"…which makes the drug Wellbutrin, agreed to pay a $3 million fine on Friday in a Boston courthouse."
"The British drugmaker reportedly paid “Lifechangers”…"
Alan: That’s I guess the series on television.
"…host Dr. Drew $275,000…"
Alan: There’s quite an incentive, eh?
"…to promote the antidepressant for non-approved uses such as obesity, addictions and sexual dysfunction. According to the complaint, as host of the late night sex and romance radio program "Loveline" in the 1990s, Dr. Drew spoke at length about using antidepressants to revive relationships and intimacy and encouraged listeners to check a website registered to GlaxoSmithKline. But the Justice Department's complaint against Dr. Drew found that he never revealed he was a paid spokesman."
Alan: You’re really listening to hour-long ads, for those who haven’t figured it out, when you watch all these programs. There are other ones out there doing it today even more popular than this guy.
"In a statement to Forbes, Dr. Drew defended comments on Wellbutrin, citing a clinical study he conducted over a decade ago."
Alan: And so on and so on. But yeah, he was definitely on the take and pushing it on television. And then the whole idea is to get the watchers to go to their doctors and ask for the particular drug that he’s on about. It’s an old scam but it works very well.
Londoners, and imagine living in London and getting a whole battery of missiles put on your rooftop for the Olympic Games, eh. So:
"Londoners lose bid against rooftop missiles for Olympics"
Alan: Because you see Britain is the most democratic country in the world.
"It has been a tough few months at the pockmarked concrete high-rise known as Fred Wigg Tower. First there was the fire, which left dozens of residents temporarily homeless. Then came the rash of burglaries of fire-damaged apartments. And now the British army will be putting a battery of high-velocity missiles on the roof. The defence ministry says the missiles, capable of shooting down a hijacked aircraft, are a key piece in the elaborate jigsaw of security for the London Olympics, which start July 27. But many residents of the east London public housing project were dismayed to find themselves suddenly on the counterterrorism front line."
"“It's kind of scary now, to be honest,” said Iqbal Hossain, who lives in the building with his wife and three children aged 2 to 14. “If it's about safety for the Olympics, what about safety for us? If there is a terrorist attack, the first thing they are going to attack is the missiles.”"
Alan: Well it is madness of course, but again it’s training the public again. This is, get used to it because this is going to go on for the rest of your lives and your children’s as well, perpetual terrorism and perpetual war. It’s that simple really.
And then the:
"Cost of Olympics to spiral to £24bn... TEN TIMES higher than 2005 estimate"
Alan: Well that’s standard with government.
"(and is it any wonder when we're forking out £335,000 for a single sculpture)"
Alan: For the Olympics, just for one single sculpture. So:
"The final bill could be ten times higher. The predicted cost of the games when London won the bid in 2005 was £2.37billion. That figure has now spiralled to more than £12billion and could reach as much as £24billion, the Sky Sports investigation claims. The Olympics public sector funding package, which covers the building of the venues, security and policing, was upped to around £9.3bn in 2007. 'Waste of money': Taxpayers' money was used to pay for this Olympic sculpture by Richard Harris, which will greet motorists entering the sailing events in Dorset."
Alan: And that one sculpture was £335,000.
"'Day of the Triffids': 'Jurassic Stones' has been blasted by residents who are furious about the cost when the country is economic meltdown."
Alan: It’s like ancient Rome, eh, they fiddle while it burns. Just spending and having a great old time at the top and parties for the big boys and using the taxpayers’ money like, you know, there’s no tomorrow. That’s really what it is, but you have to get used to that too because they’ll have a lot more of these parties for themselves all throughout the year once they really get going.
In Madrid, Spain, you’ve got Spanish police firing rubber bullets now at miners who are protesting at cutbacks in their subsidies because they get poorly paid to start with. And things are getting nasty there under the auspices of austerity. It’s still to hit us all here in the West, in the States and Canada. But Canada will be very good at it, they’ll just slip it in bit by bit by bit and people won’t even notice until they’re utterly poor. And then they’ll all be poor together so they’ll think it’s just one of the new normals that happened by themselves. But in the States they’re expecting trouble.
And Nova Scotia, on the east coast, they’ve always had the short end of the stick when it comes to big business and work. And it’s like the government almost wanted to keep it like a tourist industry. It also keeps it free for the big naval boys there too with their bases for the U.S. and Canada. So they’ve never allowed really big, any opportunity to go into Nova Scotia. So, what’s happening now under the internationalism and all the rest of it, they are allowing businesses to develop that will give other people work of course, and other companies from other countries work.
It says:
"Natural Resources Minister Charlie Parker made a clear choice about the kind of business Nova Scotia really supports. Rather than defend the rights and interests of a Nova Scotian family business, he sided instead with DDV Gold, a subsidiary of Australian company Atlantic Gold, granting the mining company vesting orders and thus ownership of 14 parcels of land in Moose River Gold Mines."
Alan: And it’s open source gold mines, you know where they literally just spray the stuff out and leave massive craters in the ground. Or else they demolish a whole hill to get a couple of ounces. Anyway:
"Some of that belongs — or rather belonged — to the Higgins family that had refused to sell any land, pointing out that they run a successful and sustainable business (providing five full-time jobs and 25 seasonal ones) producing Christmas trees on land that has been in the family for generations."
Alan: So the government overruled them and basically you know you either take the government’s offer or you get nothing at all, but the government’s going to get it either way because the mining company is getting it instead. And so they’ll come in there and extract what they can and then pull out and leave the taxpayer to clean up the mess. That’s generally what happens.
"Bill Clinton made $13.4M in 2011..."
Alan: With his golden tongue.
"...Speech Fees"
"…exceeding his previous record by some 25%."
Alan: Mind you it’s all written by scriptwriters, even when they go on these tours. So he’s got a small cut to give to them.
"“The former president's previous record for speech income earned in one year was in 2010, when he earned $10.7 million for 52 events,” CNN reported. “His speech earnings last year were nearly double the $7.5 million he earned in 2009.” All total, Clinton has earned $89 million from paid speeches since leaving the White House in January 2001. CNN pointed out that “while it is not unusual for former presidents to command millions of dollars in speaking fees after leaving office, Clinton is the only one subjected to strict disclosure requirements.” The reason: Wife Hillary Rodham Clinton's positions as U.S. senator and Secretary of State."
Alan: Because she’s got important decisions to make about blowing other countries up and things like that.
"The Center for Public Integrity estimated in a report last year that former president George W. Bush had delivered almost 140 paid speeches for at least $15 million in his first two-and-a-half years after leaving the White House."
Alan: So it goes on and on and on, comparing him to other people and so on and so on, how much per speech they get, sometimes $750,000 for a speech. Then they get all drunk and all that, and then in come the women. {Laughs} Anyway, that’s the world as we know it, eh.
I’ve mentioned before too that there is a plan, a plan actually to do with making us all utterly debased and degraded. Not only to destroy the family unit but to destroy everything basically until everyone is so helpless and dysfunctional that big government and its agencies will control your entire life from birth to death. That is an actual plan folks, for those who can’t quite get that. It’s a real, real plan. And we’ve really plummeted so fast in such a short space of time. I could take a hundred articles probably every other day from across the world at just how far we’ve gone with our debauched system.
Here’s:
"Los Angeles school…"
Alan: I mentioned this I think last year, but it…
"… fires ENTIRE staff after teachers ‘sexually abused students and fed them semen’"
Alan: I remember reading it at the time. This is an update to it.
"Faced with a shocking case of a teacher accused of playing classroom sex games with children for years, Los Angeles schools Superintendent John Deasy delivered another jolt: He removed the school's entire staff — from custodians to the principal — to smash what he called a 'culture of silence.' 'It was a quick, responsible, responsive action to a heinous situation,' he said. 'We're not going to spend a long time debating student safety.' The controversial decision underscores the 51-year-old superintendent's shake-up of the lethargic bureaucracy at the nation's second-largest school district. His swift, bold moves have rankled some and won praise from others during his first year of leadership."
"Hired with a mandate to boost achievement in the 660,000-pupil Los Angeles Unified School District,"
Alan: That’s a huge school.
"Deasy has become known for 18-hour days that involve everything from surprise classroom visits and picking up playground litter to lobbying city elite for donations and blasting Sacramento politicians over funding cuts."
And he goes on to say:
"He's also gained a reputation for outspokenness and a brisk decision-making style some have criticized as heavy-handed. Earlier this year, for instance, he ordered a substitute teacher fired after finding students doing busy work."
Alan: But when the scandal broke out, I can remember when it broke out, and I’ve got it somewhere in the archives section at cuttingthroughthematrix.com, this is what the guy was doing, blindfolding students and actually spoon-feeding them semen. The guy, the teacher involved. One of the teachers involved was Mark Berndt, accused of blindfolding students and spoon-feeding them his semen. This is America; this is the country that’s bringing their culture across the whole world. Mind you it wasn’t invented by Americans either actually; it’s maybe those running America. But this is how base it becomes at this stage of the game because everything that used to be illegal, for very good reasons, is now quite legal and promoted from the top down. Now, it’s happening everywhere because we’re all getting American movies, American shows and everything else. And that’s how you get all these ideas from, plus the massive porn industry that comes out of Hollywood along with its regular porn, called regular movies.
It says:
"‘My little girl tells me I am the best dad in the world, but it’s not true - I could not protect her’: Parents of girl, four, raped by boy, 14, tell their full horrifying story"
Alan: This is a standard common story now.
"It’s a case that’s appalled Britain: a teenage rapist freed after a judge blamed his crime on internet porn. Here, his victim’s distraught parents – who still live doors away from the attacker - tell their full horrifying story... Were it not for the imposing surroundings, you might have thought the boy in the dock was waiting for nothing more severe than a reprimand from a teacher. Clad in school uniform, rosy-cheeked and slightly on the chubby side, he shuffled awkwardly on the spot, more boy than man despite his taller-than-average height. Yet this unassuming demeanour belied the reason for his presence at Cambridge Crown Court this week, which was a singularly horrifying one. As the Mail reported on Wednesday, the boy, who cannot be named for legal reasons, had admitted to the rape of a little girl when he was 14. She was just four years old at the time, and he was her babysitter. He tricked his trusting charge by blindfolding her with one of her own dressing-up outfits and promising her a ‘chocolate’. Given both their ages, it is hard to imagine a more sordid and tragic violation of innocence. Little wonder that the parents of both the accused and the victim - both respectable married couples - wept quietly throughout proceedings from opposite ends of the public gallery. Until recently they were all friends, a relationship that has been forever shattered by what unfolded on a chilly December evening last year. Now, however, the grief of the little girl’s parents has been joined with another, equally potent emotion: anger. Given that the boy, now 15, had pleaded guilty to the violation of their daughter, they had assumed he would be given a custodial sentence. Instead, Judge Gareth Hawkesworth allowed the teenager to retain his freedom, handing out a three-year community and supervision order and blaming the boy’s actions on the corrupting effects of pornography - as well as the wider society which has allowed it to flourish."
Alan: And ain’t that a fact. I mean what do you see on television? Even the BBC, especially the BBC. It gets thrown in your face; you can’t avoid it if you’ve got a television at all. Even if you’re passing a store you’re going to see it, I mean it’s everywhere. That’s what we’ve had rammed down our throats for years now.
"Whatever you may think of his decision - and it has prompted heated discussion on internet forums and television - the effect on the victim’s family has been devastating."
Alan: Well sure it has been but the whole society is so degraded now, it truly is. And where have been the parents as they... mind you they were always getting lambasted by the liberals whenever they complained about the steps that TV was taking step by step as they pushed the envelope into where we are today.
"Police embracing tech that predicts crimes"
"A map of a city is marked up with small red squares, each indicating a 500-by-500-foot zone where crimes are likely to take place next."
Alan: It’s like "Minority Report".
"A heat-map mode shows even more precisely where cars may be stolen, houses robbed, people mugged. The program is called PredPol, and it calculates its forecasts based on times and locations of previous crimes, combined with sociological information about criminal behavior and patterns. The technology has been beta tested in the Santa Cruz, California police department for the past year, and in an L.A. police precinct for the past six months, with promising results. Predictive-analytics software is the latest piece of policing technology working its way into law-enforcement stations around the country, although it's going up against tight budgets, bureaucracy and a culture still clinging to its analog ways."
Alan: Well we can’t keep affording all this kind of stuff, especially when drones and tanks are involved and everything else that they’re demanding.
So it says:
"We had to try something because we were not being offered more cops," said Zach Friend, a crime analyst with the Santa Cruz Police Department. Last year, Friend contacted researchers working on the algorithm -- originally used for predicting earthquake aftershocks -- after reading an article in the LA Times."
Alan: And it goes on to tell you how it works and all the rest of it. And how they come to the conclusions where more crime will happen on a particular night and a particular place. But it’s predictive and it’s like "Minority Report". And it’s going to get a lot worse too, down to the individual and I guarantee you in a few years you’ll see that coming out too. Because now that they’re taking facial analysis of you too, your expressions and all of that, and you’ll be walking along the street one day after an argument with somebody or another and they’ll look at your face with a grimace on it or a bit of angst on it and the cops will just lift you and take you in for reconditioning; and that will come, that will come.
This article here is about preparing for "Climate Change-Related Public Health Scares". It says:
"New Paper Exposes The Warmists’ Next Mind Games"
"Framing climate change in terms of public health and/or national security may make climate change more personally relevant and emotionally engaging to segments of the public who are currently disengaged or even dismissive of the issue."
"Don’t expect the results of this study to be made very public. But do expect them to be made very well known to the mainstream media, and watch them zealously apply the results with abandon soon in future communication with audiences."
Alan: So it’s to show you the next tactics of how they’re going to go ahead with scaring you to death over climate change. Back with more after this.
{Break ♫}
Hi folks, we’re back and just before I take the caller who’s been hanging on the line there. This article goes on to talk about how they’re going to use scary stories about your personal health and blame it on climate change to get you active and to make you believe in it all. It says:
"…influenza, mental illness, epidemics, widespread allergies, rheumatism, malaria, cancer, depression…"
Alan: In other words the whole gambit will get blamed on climate change to get people involved, otherwise we’ll ignore them you see with all their scare stories. Now there’s Alex who has been hanging on the line there. Are you still there Alex from New York? Hello?
Alex: Hello. Hey, I have a few questions. The first one is I’ve been listening lately to some old broadcasts from you and other people and like going back to like the 60’s and stuff. And when I’m listening to people who know what’s going on, it’s just any of those times whatever they’re saying it sounds like they could be saying it today as well. So, I’m just wondering if every year it’s like this is the year everything is going to collapse, and everything is going to happen right now, and we’re going to have martial law. It just seems like it’s been going on like this forever.
Alan: Oh it’s been going on. It was all prepared long before 9/11 happened, because first of all they’ve got to prepare everything through government agencies and laws, get laws on the books, all that kind of thing. And the United Nations kept turning out their plans for the future. So many government meetings, so many international meetings giving out their plans for the future, so you didn’t have to guess at what was coming if you stuck to what was delivered out there by the big foundations themselves.
And then of course 9/11 came in and they had the perfect scenario. In fact the actual club that Bush and Wolfowitz and all the rest of his boys belonged to was the Project for the New American Century, which on their own website said they would need something to happen in America on the scale of a Pearl Harbor event to kick off their whole agenda which was to take over the entire Middle East and grab all their oil and all the rest of it. So they got what they wanted and in comes martial law basically on the general public. You are living under martial law, although they don’t have to use the term martial law, but you’re living under it nonetheless.
So, there was no guesswork involved as to where it was to go. And if you go into the writings of those concerned with the big international meetings, those involved at the United Nations, you’ll see all the rest of the stuff that’s to come, where they said they’d emasculate the males. You see that today, it’s already happening, chemically. Infertility is the most rising problem they have in the western countries, that’s not by chance either because overpopulation was another big concern for them and then all the trade treaties would bind the world together under global governance. Well we’re here today with that. Your government is signing trade treaties about one every other month with some other group. Everything that was predicted is happening as you speak today. And they’re going right up now with their predictions up into the year 2054 and 2040, it depends on the organization.
Alex: Okay, and also I was wondering if you felt like the elite hated black people more than others, and why do they if so?
Alan: Well that all came out after H.G. Wells drew up a list of them, so did some of the biggest economists that worked for Britain, of those that would be exterminated. The American Indians, Irish, Scots according to H.G. Wells, blacks as well, and so on. They had a whole list drafted up, even with the top economists of the time. They all agreed they’d have to eliminate those peoples. They said they wouldn’t fit into the modern economic system they were bringing in. But thanks for calling.
And from Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s goodnight, and may your God or your Gods go with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
Melinda Gates Talks Eugenics
Can Fracking Pollute Water?
Chemicals Used in Fracking Operations
Hidden Cameras can Read You 164 feet Away
India Outsmarts Big Pharma---So Far
Celebrity Addiction "Specialist" Paid by
GlaxoSmithKline to Promote Drug
Londoners' Objections to Rooftop Missile System
Ignored
Cost of Olympics
Greek Miners want Self-Management
Nova Scotia Open for Business?
Talk is Cheap---eh?---Bill Clinton's Golden Tongue
Los Angeles School Fires Entire Staff after Teachers
Sexually Abused Children and Fed them Semen
Rape of 4yr.-old by 14yr.-old Blamed on Internet
Pornography
Police Using "Minority Report" Techniques
Warmists Next Strategy
|
Alan's Materials Available for Purchase and Ordering Information: |
|||
|
"Cutting Through" |
& |
"Waiting for the Miracle....." |
|
|
Ancient Religions and History MP3 CDs: |
& |
Blurbs and 'Cutting Through the Matrix' Shows on MP3 CDs (Up to 50 Hours per Disc) |
|
|
"Reality Check Part 1" & "Reality Check Part 2 - Wisdom, Esoterica and ...TIME" |
|||