Oct. 6, 2008 (#176)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt Oct. 6, 2008:
"If Not So Serious, t'would be Comic,
Straight-Faced Politicos and Men Economic,
A United Stand for Delegation,
New Global System, Death of the Nation,
Army's New Orders, They'll be Fighting for
A Hundred Years Urban Perpetual War
At the End of Which, Births New Civilization,
Sterile, Reduced, Tubal Ligation"
© Alan Watt Oct. 6, 2008
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Oct. 6, 2008 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
"Code of Silence" by Bruce Springsteen
There's a code of silence that we don't dare speak
There's a wall between us and a river so deep
And we keep pretending that there's nothing wrong
But there's a code of silence and it can't go on
Is the truth so elusive, so elusive as you can see
that it ain't enough baby
To bridge the distance between you and me
There's a list of grievance 100 miles long
There's a code of silence and it can't go on
Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on the 6th of October, 2008. Newcomers look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site and download as many of the previous talks Iíve given as possible. Listen to them at your leisure. I try and give you the short cuts into the big picture of what has been running this world and why events that are currently in the media ARE there and where itís all going. Youíll find out that weíre just living through a script. A script written by big, powerful agencies and institutions which all work together globally to bring in what they call ďGlobalization,Ē ďThe New World Order,Ē ďThe New Economic Order,Ē and many other terms all meaning the same thing. Also look into alanwattsentientsentinel.eu for transcripts which you can download and print up, transcripts of the shows Iíve done in the past and theyíre in the various languages of Europe.
Beware of all mimicking sites. There are some sites out there that mimic me and if you went to those pages youíd think it was me and youíll be trailed off into anti-Semitic sites. Thatís DEFAMATION, thatís intentional and Iím working on these ones right now. I allow them to do the right thing and then I come down on them pretty heavily. Because when youíre doing what Iím doing, you expect to be attacked from different quarters. And you do get attacked, indeed, by dirty campaigns. So beware if you go into other sites, if theyíre not ON my web site cuttingthroughthematrix.com, they are not mine. Itís the same with forums. Donít be tracked into forums that pretend that they have my authority or that I am involved with them because Iím involved with NO forums, whatsoever. I think personally anyone who does get sucked into them, is asking for trouble because in the CYBER WARS, and there ARE cyber wars out there, run by big agencies, theyíre either all infiltrated or the agencies started them up in the first place. They use the ďwilling foolsĒ that join to do their dirty work. Well, itís the willing fools that take the heat when legalities come down. Thatís why theyíre set up that way. So beware of them.
We are going through amazing changes. Thereís war on all fronts, as I say, thereís war in cyberspace. Iíve read the articles from mainstream media and the military to do with this particular type of warfareÖ its dirty tricks. They use all different kind of means to do it. The civilian population in modern warfare, and it has been since the 1930s, are fair game because they call it ďTotal War.Ē Total War has been preached by Britain before any other country and they were taught that at Sandhurst (Royal Military Academy Sandhurst) back in the 30s and even trained one of the main Generals that Hitler used, in Sandhurst, along this particular course, WHERE THE POPULATIONS WERE NOW THE TARGETS. The idea being, that if you flatten the populations then literally they canít vote for anybody or back anybody up or even be an unwilling slave to them. You just destroy the populations. Similar to what they did during World War II, where Dowding, the big commander in chief of the Air Force in Britain, bombed and flattened the workersí homes who were working in the factories. Thatís how modern warfare is. But itís moved into other fields now, as well, especially to do with Internet and communication. It just astounds me to think that people still blab everything out on the internet thinking that somehow information is kept quiet between people when itís shared and itís also INTERFERED WITH by the big agencies WHO ARE AT WAR WITH THE PUBLIC. Iíll be back with more after this break.
Hi folks, Iím Alan Watt and weíre Cutting Through The Matrix. Iíve been talking about this financial hoopla weíve had for the last couple of weeks and the ramifications of it and really the things that are behind itÖ big forces behind it. Because you cannot have a global system, a global government run in a socialistic fashion, which is really closer to communistic fashion, for the people that is, the majority of the people, where the big fascist rule on top. You canít do it without integrating ALL economies and THATíS what theyíve been working on for many years. In fact many of the treaties, the GATT treaty and so on had much more to do with the integration of economies together. The idea being and this is what war is about, modern warfare, is the creation of empires. You MUST have conflict to create empires and how you get the empire together is by signing treaties and binding you all together against those guys over there. Meanwhile, those guys over there are binding other countries into themselves to defeat you. And out of it all, you unite together and now youíve got half the planet or three quarters of the planet and thatís how you play this game.
The cold war was so necessary to bring it about. Itís interesting too, during the Reece Commission by Senator Dodd, when he talked to the foundation heads at Ford and Carnegie and so on, he was told by the one in charge of Ford, the CEO of Ford, that their job was to integrate the system of the Soviets, seamlessly and easily into that of America. That was always the plan. He was told the truth and it almost floored him because who would have guessed. Who would have guessed that this is rigged? Empires were built and this century is to be the New American Century but itís not the American peopleís century, because the American people are lumped along with every other population on the planet. They have no special favors to give the American people but they will use the might and the technological know-how and the military to bring this all about across the planet. But they must have a completely seamless, INTERdependent, interlocked economic system. I said that whatíll come out of this will be cries. Cries like slogans and thatís what you get, like weapons of mass destruction. When they all come out, at the top, through the major media, and major figures speaking the same catch phrases and giving out the same slogans you know ITíS A COORDINATED EFFORT AND ITíS BEEN PREPLANNED. This is what they call a COORDINATED FRONT to the press. Thatís what they call it. Then the public will think, as they daydream through life, that everything MUST BE SO, I guess itís the only way to get out of this particular problem. They donít think of any alternatives and they can NEVER see the real plan behind it.
Yahoo News, Canada, this is an article that was put out a couple of days ago I think. It says here:
IMF chief calls for united European response to crisis
Sat Oct 4, 2008 1:46 PM
PARIS (AFP) - IMF chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn (Alan: I wonder if heís a relative of Genghis?) called Saturday on European countries to provide a united response to the financial crisis, following talks with French President Nicolas Sarkozy.
"In Europe there is a need for coordination," Strauss-Kahn told journalists hours before a mini-summit of European leaders. "It has to be indicated to the markets... that European countries will not react every man for himself.
"The situation is very worrying. The banks' losses are the worst we've ever seen," the International Monetary Fund's chairman warned. "The IMF thinks it's a global problem (A: See itís a GLOBAL PROBLEM) that needs a global response."
Then they go on and on and on and what theyíre prattling about is setting up a centralized system for Europe. Which also means youíll have a centralized system for the Americas. Thatís GUARANTEED. And one for the Far East as well. That falls right in with the three trading blocks that Karl Marx talked about in the 1800s. When he was talking about thisÖ and this also means too, that when one countryís banks go under, the other countries will bail them out. We all saw some of this not too long ago, if you remember a few years ago, when the man that was touted to head the NAFTA, THE MOST TRUSTED MAN, to head NAFTA, who was the President of Mexico, ran off with the treasury of Mexico. After it was in all the news papers, he ran off and ended up living in a few different countries including Canada and then Ireland. But the US and Canada had to bail out Mexico then. We forget that. See itís already been done.† Now, they want to set up organizations in each trading block which will be subject to the World Bank. Thatís what itís all about. This is all strategy and weíre all just watching and living through the act; the play is working itself out right now.
Then you find this backed up as well by an article from the Guardian.co.uk. It says here:
Brown convenes economic 'war cabinet' to help UK through credit crunch
Prime minister appoints Paul Myners, chairman of Land Securities and Guardian Media Group, as City minister
Richard Wray / guardian.co.uk / Friday October 03 2008
Gordon Brown has convened an economic war cabinet to bolster Britain against the increasingly turbulent conditions in world markets and appointed Paul Myners, chairman of Land Securities and Guardian Media Group, as City minister.
"Quite simply, the new era (Alan: Thereís a NEW ERA remember) that we have entered requires new ways of governing," (A: New ways of governing, this is about GLOBAL GOVERNANCE, theyíre talking about.) Brown explained of the creation of the National Economic Council (NEC). "We don't just need to change policies to deal with the new financial difficulties but the way we take decisions, the way we govern, has got to change as well."
The creation of the council is one of several changes wrought by Brown in order to deal with the fall-out from the past three weeks which have seen the world's credit markets seize up, investment banks collapse, the effective nationalisation of Bradford & Bingley (A: another big bank over there) and the government forced to guarantee personal savings deposits of up to £50,000 amid fears that even more high street banks could fail.
The NEC was immediately branded by the City as an economic war cabinet.
"Call it what you will," Brown responded. "The important thing to say is that we are taking all the action that is necessary and we will do whatever it takes to ensure not just the stability of the economy Ö but also that we get the economy onto a path of growth, where people can see we are being fair in the way we deliver prosperity for the future." (A: He doesnít define who itís to, though.)
"These are new times. The global economy (A: the global economy) will never be the same again. (A: Now thatís what we heard after 9/11. The world will never be the same again. Well hereís another major statement, THE GLOBAL ECONOMY WILL NEVER BE THE SAME AGAIN. Remember that. Remember that everything economic wise is going to change.) Huge changes are taking place. We have to deal with it in a new way." (A: And guess what? Itís all preplanned, this wonderful new way.)
Then it goes on to list all the different people who are in on this new economic war cabinet and theyíre knighting them all. Theyíre knighting every single one of them, so they can all be PEERS of each other. You understand that when you get knighted, you cannot be tried by a general jury? You have to be tried by a jury of your PEERS. So theyíre above, you might say, the common, ordinary law. Quiet interesting. Thatís why theyíre getting knighted. So weíve got one after the other, the IMF chief. Youíve got Brown in Britain and youíve got the European leader, all crying out for this new global system, a new way of dealing with finance.
There is also another article thatís important too. Because with the weather warfare thatís going on and itís not the weather warfare between nations, itís, unfortunately, war upon peopleís own populations or governmentís own populations. Thatís why your own governments will not discuss it; all the aerial spraying and so on. But the food in Britain has been pretty well come to a standstill because of the incredible rain theyíve had all summer; very much like weíve had here in Canada and across the bread basket of Canada and the United States. The bread baskets of both countries, or three countries, were flooded out. Here in Ontario, it was daily rain and thunder storms for TWO AND A HALF MONTHS. Mind you, you could get up early and watch them spraying the blazes out of the sky. So, guess what? You donít have as many spuds as you used to have. All your veggies, etc. are down. Theyíre going to be rather scarce come this winter and everything will go up. Mean while, you also have the NGOs, you know these Non Governmental Organizations which are based on the Soviet system. The Soviet, on the exoteric level, had to pretend that it was run by the people so they had Non Governmental Organizations. Thatís what the ďsovietsĒ mean, rule by councils. These NGOs pretended that they spoke on behalf of the people but the heads of them all were appointed by the Politburo and itís the same in the West.
Remember that article I read before by Norman Dodd, quite a few months back, where he talked about the Sovietization system would be brought into America. WELL, ITíS HERE and itís across the western world as well. That also ties in with an article I read from the Club of Rome where they said that they looked at all the systems of the world for controlling and governing the people and they FAVORED COLLECTIVISM. They meant the Soviet System. So theyíre using it all.
Iíve also mentioned that warfare and all that comes in war, that means that people moving, BEING MOVED as refugees, food rationing, gasoline rationing, will all come through in this war because they must create a full WORLD WAR situation. And they are using NGOs to push some of these parts. They call them actors, by the way, these NGO groups.
Now, remember that article I read from a book that was passed around to the congressmen on the congressional steps by Newt Gingrich a few years ago called The Third Wave and the author of that was the author of Future Shock [Alvin Toffler]. The guy who is a futurist whoís in on the big plans and he mentions in the book that eventually the system that they will bring in is to be a vegetarian world and IT MUST BE SO but he doesnít say why. Iíll continue with this Guardian story after these messages.
Hi folks, Iím Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix. I was recapping some of the previous articles Iíve read about HOW theyíll get a whole war situation going with all that goes with warfare situations because if you can get the whole world going through this kind of mode of thinking weíre at total war with rationing and terrorism everywhere and the economy going down the tubes and weíre fighting for our survival and all the rest of it and getting rationing on the go and refugees moving around, that all brings it home. We tend to obey governments and just get rushed along. Weíre actually stampeding but theyíre guiding us at the head of the herd and we just follow along and do what weíre told. Thatís what they advocated from the Club of Rome, that type of scenario. WE DO WHAT WEíRE TOLD AND OBEY RULES WITHOUT QUESTION DURING TIMES OF WARFARE. So they got to get it all going for this century and part of it too is rationing food. Now the Guardian, Tuesday, talks about this. Now listen to this:
Meat must be rationed to four portions a week,
says report on climate change
ē Study looks at food impact on greenhouse gases
ē Return to old-fashioned cooking habits urged
Juliette Jowit The Guardian, Tuesday September 30 2008
People will have to be rationed to four modest (Alan: modest can be very small, it depends on whoís deciding what modesty means) portions of meat and one litre of milk a week if the world is to avoid run-away climate change, a major new report warns. (A: Remember who put out that first IDEA of convincing the public that they were responsible for global warming and so on and they even came up with the idea of global warming and that was the Club of Rome. Thatís in their own book, The First Global Revolution. They tell you in there, they admit to it that it was their idea, they dreamed it up. Itís to dominate our lives. We all have to adapt by its reports and so on.)
The report, by the Food Climate Research Network (A: Thatís an NGO group, itís not a government group, itís an NGO, the Soviet, the New Soviet), based at the University of Surrey, also says total food consumption should be reduced, especially "low nutritional value" treats such as alcohol, sweets and chocolates.
It urges people to return to habits their mothers or grandmothers would have been familiar with: buying locally in-season products, cooking in bulk and in pots with lids or pressure cookers, avoiding waste and walking to the shops - alongside more modern tips such as using the microwave and internet shopping.
The report goes much further than any previous advice after mounting concern about the impact of the livestock industry on greenhouse gases (A: Do you remember that farce they had a few years ago with the prion they suddenly discovered? The only one place where they could actually find it was a high government lab and they were the only ones who could identify this prion that caused the mad cow disease and then basically WIPED OUT THE FOOD INDUSTRY, the meat industry of Britain. They had pyramids, in the news papers, PYRAMIDS OF BURNING CATTLE AND PIGS. You couldnít believe it. It was incredible what they did. Here theyíre going at it again.) and rising food prices. It follows a four-year study of the impact of food on climate change and is thought to be the most thorough study of its kind. (A: Which means nothing at all.)
Tara Garnett, the report's author, warned that campaigns encouraging people to change their habits voluntarily were doomed to fail and urged the government (A: seeÖ) to use caps on greenhouse gas emissions and carbon pricing (A: Carbon pricing means pricing food out of existence, folks.) to ensure changes were made. "Food is important to us in a great many cultural and symbolic ways (A: no kidding, no kidding, hey?), and our food choices are affected by cost, time, habit and other influences," the report says. "Study upon study has shown that awareness-raising campaigns alone are unlikely to work, particularly when it comes to more difficult changes."
The report's findings are in line with an investigation by the October edition of the Ecologist magazine (A: Another big one, you see.), which found that arguments for people to go vegetarian or vegan to stop climate change and reduce pressure on rising food prices were exaggerated and would damage the developing world in particular, where many people depend on animals for essential food, other products such as leather and wool, and for manure and help in tilling fields to grow other crops.
Instead, it recommended cutting meat consumption by at least half and making sure animals were fed as much as possible on grass and food waste which could not be eaten by humans. (A: You know the cattle used to eat grass all the time until the big boys, you know the ones that are all into the GMO foods, came out with the pellets and so on, and thatís why itís effecting them, by the way. You should see some of the documentation thatís come out on Monsantoís feed and whatís happened to the male pigs, whoíve become suddenly sterile within 2 weeks but thatís another story and thatís on the modified corn, by the way, for those who like corn flakes.)
"The notion that cows and sheep are four-legged weapons of mass destruction has become something of a distraction from the real issues in both climate change and food production," said Pat Thomas, the Ecologist's editor.
The head of the United Nations intergovernmental panel on climate change, Rajendra Pachauri, also sparked global debate this month when he urged people to have at least one meat-free day a week.
What Iím showing you here is the UNITED FRONT METHOD. Whenever you find itís coming from different sources, on the same topics, at the same time, you have a united front. This is coordinated, you see. Coordination is very important to them. Itís like when Bush and Condoleezza and all the rest of the gang come out and they say weapons of mass destruction, independently of each other. Theyíre told to parrot these phrases to the public. When you see the same articles appearing from all the big sources, from the big players who have a stake in this, stake is no pun by the way, then you know itís a coordinated thing. Iíll be back with more after these messages.
Hi folks, Iím Alan Watt and I was rambling on there about the coming vegetarian world because they say IT MUST BE SO. They donít tell you WHY it must be so, but part of the reason is that youíll be on their GMO food. This modified stuff that is top secret, you know, all the stuff that went into it was TOP SECRET. Look at the people who helped make it. Youíll find they all belong to the old IG Farben groups. You know, those nice guys during World War II that made all kinds of fancy chemicals and these are the characters now who are making the food because THEY LOVE YOU, THEY LOVE YOU SO MUCH they want to see you fit and healthy. These characters are involved in various kinds of research. Why would you bring thousands of specialists in genetics together to make a better carrot? These specialists obviously donít work just with the food industry; they work in warfare industries as well.
We already see the effects of the GM food on people. Itís having the same effect on people as it did on the rats and mice. It gives them cancers of the stomach and a whole host of other things. Itís engineered that way plus itís so dosed with chemicals, TEN TIMES as much pesticides as the old stuff used to get and the plants soak that stuff up. Thereís no point just washing that stuff off, itís IN THE PLANT ITSELF. Not only that, the plantís engineered to create its own insecticides and youíre eating that too. Itís just amazing WHATíS REALLY GOING ON and the public are kept in the dark. So much in the dark, in fact, Canadians were eating the stuff for 10 YEARS and the only people who knew was the Canadian government. You know those ones who represent the people? It was done with a secret agreement between the government and Monsanto. Of course, theyíll be studying the health effects too, to see if weíre coming down with the rates of illnesses weíre supposed to, no doubt. Thatís why we werenít told. In fact, if it hadnít broken out from Britain, weíd never have known. Weíd never have known.
Theyíre at war with the people, basically. Youíll find that the pesticides they use on these particular products always cause the same kind of things. Apart from cancers and so on, they also cause STERILITY. Quite an amazing thing since they want to REDUCE THE POPULATIONS. After all, this is a time for total war. Total war. Itís just astounding whatís really going on if people could understand it. Hereís the thing too, I should mention as well, sometimes people will hit me and say, ďBut whatís the good news, Alan?Ē See, weíve all been trained that way. Weíve watched all the movies and the heroes generally win at the end and youíre given the GOOD NEWS, that somehow evil cannot triumph. My answer to that is to LOOK AT YOUR HISTORY, the REAL HISTORY. Not the 5 year old books that you get in school but the advanced books with depth and DATA in it. Youíll find that evil has won FREQUENTLY in the past. The plans of very wise men have come to fruition and theyíve won many, many times before because they are the only ones who are organized and they have the power to make it happen. When you control the money and financing of the planet, itís no big deal to have a 1000 points of light, or think tanks, headed by another 1000 points of light working towards the agenda FOR YOU. Itís no big deal whatsoever. Thatís in the education system, through the media, and so on. They all create a UNITED FRONT and give the SAME stories and the SAME opinions, which become YOUR opinions. Thatís how simple it is.
Before I go to callers, thereís one more article I must read tonight. Itís from the US Army Field Manual, 6th of October, 2008. Thereís two versions of it: one for the public and one, I guess, for the military itself. You should read both of them because the one for the public is always so watered down and they try to turn soldiers into peacekeepers. You know, war is peace and all that Orwellian stuff? It says here:
Executive Summary 6 October 2008
US Army Field Manual 3-07
The Roadmap from conflict to peace
Today, the Nation is embarking on a journey into an uncertain future where regional conflicts threaten to expand as a result of increased global competition for natural resources (Alan: That ties in with an article I read last week where they talked about the US, since this is the New American Century, where they must go after all natural resources; they must PLUNDER them basically and get them any way they can, from emerging nations or existing nations, by any means possible, including using the American culture which is toxic, you see. Theyíve weaponized the culture to bring down societies from within. Which is interesting because thatís exactly what Khrushchev said about America and what would happen to America back in the 1960s. Well, he was right. It has been done. And it wasnít done by chance and it wasnít done because the people demanded it either. It was because the Culture Industry was all part of the bringing down process. The CIA ran the Culture Industry.), teeming urban populations with rising popular expectations, unrestrained technological diffusion, and a global economy struggling to meet mounting demands from emerging markets and third world countries. Americaís future abroad is unlikely to resemble Afghanistan or Iraq, where we grapple with the burden of nation-building (A: They call it Nation BUILDING as they steal and plunder.) under fire. Instead, we confront a landscape marked by emerging nations discontented with the status quo (A: They donít like being plundered, itís a strange response that people have down through time and history.), flush with wealth and ambition, and seeking a new global balance of power. Here, the greatest threat to our national security comes not in the form of violent extremism or ambitious powers, but from fragile states either unable or unwilling to provide for the most basic needs of their people. (A: Thatís why the US went into Afghanistan and using Total War, they went after all the resources. They blew up all the drinking water plants. They blew up the food manufacturing plants. They blew it all up to make sure they had NO ABILITY to satisfy their basic needs.)
The character of this environment is unlike any other in recent American history, where military forces operating among the people of world decide the major battles and engagements. Here, the margin of victory is measured in far different terms from the wars of our past. Now and in the future, the allegiance, trust, and confidence of the people in the operational area may be the surest means to win the peace. However, time may be the ultimate arbiter of success: time to bring safety and security to an embattled populace; time to provide for the essential, immediate humanitarian needs of the people (A: Ha! Itís so hypocritical, this article. But thatís written by PR people for the military. And then they go on and on and on.† They talk about using SOFT ACTORSÖ soft actors is a term they use for NGOs and they put NGO groups in once they take these countries over, Non Governmental Organizations or the Sovietized system, thatís what it is, to make those countries copy, emulate the British and American way. )
In this era of persistent conflict (A: Persistent conflictÖRemember the article I read last week?), we will work through and with the community of nations to defeat insurgency (A: That means uprisings as well, anywhere in the world, including back home.), assist fragile states, and provide vital humanitarian aid to the suffering. (A: Itíll probably be a cheap bullet!)† Achieving victory will assume new dimensions as we strengthen our ability to generate ―soft power (A: Soft power again, is the NGOs with all the propaganda machinery.) to promote participation in government, spur economic development, and address the root causes of conflict among the disenfranchised populations of the world. Military success alone will not be sufficient to prevail in this environment. To confront the challenges before us, we must strengthen the capacity of the other elements of national power, leveraging the full potential of our interagency partners. (A: Interagency partners.)
At the heart of this effort is a comprehensive approach to stability operations that integrates the tools of statecraft with our military forces, international partners, humanitarian organizations, and the private sector. (A: Again, thatís the foundations and the NGOs.) The comprehensive approach ensures unity of effort among a very rich and diverse group of actors while fostering the development of new capabilities (A: They use actors by the way, because itís A THEATRE of war. They use the term ďactorsĒ right in this document.) to shape the operational environment in ways that preclude the requirement for future military intervention. (A: It means you put up a puppet government and you train a generation to emulate the one who rules it.)† It postures the military to perform a role common throughout our historyóensuring the safety and security of the local populace, (A: Did you know that was the common role of the military down through history, it was to ensure the safety and security of the local populace? I hope you know that now and understand that.) assisting with reconstruction, (A: Thatís what the Army is. Theyíre a form of social work. Thatís what theyíre really there for.) and providing basic sustenance and public services. (A: Thatís why they starved Iraq, put by an embargo, to stop basic sustenance.) Equally important, it defines the role of military forces in support of the civilian agencies charged with leading these complex endeavors.
(A: Civilian agencies again are your NGOs, your big authorized groups, the Red Cross, etc, and also the United Nationís government agencies. Thatís what theyíre talking about here. So much for democracyÖ in fact, democracy isnít mentioned anywhere. Theyíve dropped the word now, which is good of them because that used to be so hypocritical, when they used it, especially the United Nations because no one elects the United Nations, you see, theyíre just there. Itís a corporation.)
In a comprehensive approach, military forces establish conditions that facilitate the efforts of the other instruments of national and international power Ė providing the requisite security and control to stabilize an operational area. Army Field Manual 3-07, Stability Operations, addresses military stability operations within the broader context of United States Government (A: the broader contextÖ thatís really very broad because we never get to see it.) reconstruction and stabilization efforts. It describes the role of military forces in supporting those broader efforts by leveraging the coercive and constructive capabilities of the force to establish a safe and secure environment; facilitate reconciliation among local or regional adversaries; establish political, legal, social, and economic institutions (A: In other words, set up a mirror of your own country. Thatís what its about.); and help transition (A: Help the change.) responsibility to a legitimate civil authority operating under the rule of law. (A: In other words, theyíre going to be the same as every other country that used to think it was free.) This transition is fundamental to the shift in focus toward long-term development activities where military forces support broader efforts in pursuit of national and international objectives. (A: Now, how could it do both? How could it do national and international objectives? Itís because WE HAVE NO NATIONS. Weíre already international and there is an international body governing all of this, this big show.) Success in these endeavors typically requires a long-term commitment by external actors and is ultimately determined by the support and participation of the host-nation populace. (A: They make sure the host nation accept it after being pounded and pounded and pounded for long enough. Thatís how itís done.)
I used to read the old history books about Rome. Rome never said that it was going in to plunder a country. They were always going in to vanquish heathenism or barbarians and bring them civilization. We hear the same things used today as the pirates plunder and rape and pillage and bring into being what they call, their NEW WORLD ORDER. Where the ďnatural aristocracyĒ should rule over the profane and that is what itís all really, REALLY about. The pirates are in charge and theyíve been in charge for a long time.
It was interesting to see Mr. Tony Blair who recently became Catholic in a political move and immediately start up an organization, that he was put at the head of, that was GOING TO BRING ALL FAITHS TOGETHER. All faiths together because they would never, ever bypass the Catholic Church. Itís a big, massive institution and millions of people still follow the faith even though those at the top were taken over long ago. You wouldnít throw it away, itís too handy. Itís too handy a tool to use. There he is bringing intergovernmental, basically interfaith things all together on the premise that no particular one can claim to be right. Thatís what they all must understand and thatís a MUST BE in todayís society. No one can claim to have the truth, which means that ALL those religions have no truth at all, in that case. If you sit and think about it, you see?
So there they are. They use all means possible and they always use religion. Why bypass something thatís already set up and even though itís conquered at the top? They donít miss a trick. Meanwhile, they have New Agers all dancing around in glee looking to bring in this new wonderful world where we can all be one and all be connected to each other. Have you looked around you recently? Have you looked at the people around you? Would you like truly to be all one with them? Would you like to have them inside your head? Think about it. Really, really think about it. Itís a scary thought. Very scary thought!
I think we have time for a couple of callers. Thereís Kyle in Connecticut. Are you there Kyle?
Kyle: Good to hear you tonight. How are you doing?
Alan: Not so bad.
Kyle: Isnít it funny how fisherman use a net to catch fish and they caught everyone with this Christianity and theyíve used them to bring us up to this point. They think theyíre all going to get raptured or something.
Alan: I think term now is ruptured!
Kyle: Yeah. Do you think the internet is just another tool to kind of gather everybody up together?
Alan: Yes. Brzezinski said so in his book Between Two Ages. Before they even gave it to us, he said they are going to be given a means of communication that will help bring in a global type culture and thatís what itís for. It also creates massive confusion but more than ever, it helps to monitor everyoneÖ everyoneís thoughts, personality profiles, every individual that goes on it and prattles on about what they like to prattle on about. They have literally a CLONE of you inside a computer acting like you with all your character traits and so on. They can predict what you will do in certain circumstances by the collection of this data. Iíve read the articles from the military academies about this very thing.
Kyle: So people just need to realize there are no more civilians, its total war against every human being on this planet.
Alan: Yes and it has been going on for quite a long time. All major religions will be used and once they take over the Muslims, they will be used too.
Kyle: I just canít get on about these New Agers who think that theyíre going to create this beautiful reality just by imagining it.
Alan: Well, they kind ofÖ the image is in the mind and they worship an image of something. Some people know what it is, some donít. Iíll be back with more after this break.
Hi folks, Iím Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix and weíll go to Vernon from New Hampshire. Are you there Vernon?
Vernon: How you doing this evening, Alan?
Alan: Iím hanginí in here.
Vernon: Okay. Thatís good to hear. I want to ask you a quick question. At any time in human existence, was there ever a time when there was a fair playing field between us conscious humans and the ruling elite? Or if there was, what was the scheme or the con that gave the elite the upper hand they have on us today?
Alan: The con was the invention of a substitute for barter which in the early forms was MONEY although it was weighed out, at one time. It was mainly silver and then gold, it was weighed out and then getting the populaces to accept it. The second con wasÖ actually the first con was to create the CITY and then have the people inside, who NEEDED this thing called money. Then with the money you could hire, you could tax from them and then create armies and pay them with the same money. Armies can go off and conquer. So the first thing really was the creation of the city. Thatís why the big occultic boys will always mention Nimrod, their big hero, who literally is the Satan figure, the rebel. He creates the first city, his emblem is the city as was his wifeís, Semiramis, and they went off to conquer the rural areas. Really when you look at empire building all theyíve done down through time, especially in the Roman era, was to plunder countries, introduce the money system, and then start taxing it back from them. Then building big projects, big building projects, roadways, buildings, and so on with the money they taxed from them. So the introduction of what they call a commercialized system was theirs from the very beginning.
Vernon: Okay, so before that we were all on a fair playing field and everything was all equal in life, right?
Alan: There was more chance because most peoples lived in tribes. They had a chief; often they elected a chief for a certain point of time. If the chief got too big for his boots and wanted to continue a dynasty and got a few henchmen, there were always enough people in the tribe to get rid of them. Once you have a standing Army you canít do it quite so easily and even the founding fathers of America had debates about this, in fact, to satisfy the people, they knew this stuff, that standing Armies were ALWAYS TURNED AGAINST THE POPULACE. They knew this, so standing armies is a big problem and again, you can only employ a standing army if you can pay them with money. If you donít have enough money, they just go home after a while; they get bored.
Vernon: Okay. So one could say that the elite, they might be a sub-species from the rest of us conscious humans then?
Alan: They certainly are a SEPARATE species in that they know the wisdom of the ages, as they call it. They have the archives of histories. They use philosophy and histories to the maximum. Old man Rockefeller will say that in so many speeches. He says if you donít know your history, then youíre doomed to failure and heís also speaking from his own point of view and his own kindís point of view. Because, whatever man has been able to do in the past or youíve done with mankind in the past, through culture, you can REPEAT IT. You can make people do anything you want if you know the formula and Plato said that. This understanding of human nature has been exploited for thousands of years, AT LEAST. Thanks for calling.
Thatís the music coming in for the end of tonightís show. Itís been a rush through as always. From Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, itís good night and may your God or your Gods go with you.
Transcribed by Diana