July 27th, 2011 (#884)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:

Poem Copyright Alan Watt July 27th, 2011:

Super Congress, Never Relaxes,
Paying Debt by Future Taxes:

"The Super Congress Rises Above the Sorrow,
A Private Group Who'll Lend and Borrow,
Directly Dealing with Bankers' Men,
Dealing with Pounds, Euros and Yen,
And for Each Note Made, More Debt to Pay,
Plus Interest Accumulating Every Day,
As Government Builds into the Sky,
Wishing the People Below Goodbye,
Being Lofty and Mighty the Needs are Greater,
Until it Collapses with Debt Sooner or Later"
© Alan Watt July 27th, 2011

Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt – July 27th, 2011  (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)


cuttingthroughthematrix.com
alternate sites:
cuttingthroughthematrix.net  ,   .us  ,   .ca
alanwattcuttingthroughthematrix.ca

mirror site:
cuttingthrough.jenkness.com
European site includes all audios & downloadable TRANSCRIPTS in European languages for print up:
alanwattsentientsentinel.eu


Information for purchasing Alan’s books, CDs, DVDs and DONATIONS:

Canada and AmericaPayPal, Cash, personal checks &
 for the US, INTERNATIONAL postal money orders / for Canada, INTERNAL postal money orders
 (America:  Postal Money orders - Stress the INTERNATIONAL pink one, not the green internal one.)

Outside the AmericasPayPal, Cash, Western Union and Money Gram
(Money Gram is cheaper; even cheaper is a Money Gram check – in Canadian dollars:

 mail via the postal services worldwide.)

PayPal Orders: USE THE DONATE BUTTON ON THE WEBSITE – AND –
Send a separate email along with the donation (list your order, name and address)

Click the link below for your location (ordering info):
USA        Canada        Europe/Scandinavian        All Other Countries


 

Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through the Matrix on July the 27th 2011.  For newcomers, look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com.  Help yourself to the audios which are there for free download.  There’s hundreds to choose from.  And hopefully you’ll be a bit wiser, afterwards, when you understand the world is not the way it’s presented to you through your education or via the media.  You’ll understand that literally the centuries are planned in advance and all the major wars that you see are only parts of strategies along the way, and global warming, all this nonsense, the carbon taxes, these are all ways to bring in a big agenda for control over everyone across the planet.  So, I try and give you the foundations that are involved with it, the sources like the Club of Rome who came up with the idea of global warming.  They said that would fit the bill.  And of course, all the other organizations, the foundations, the bankers, who were involved in running the future, your future, and for those who have children, the few who do, their future as well.  Help yourself to them.

 

And remember too, you’re the audience that bring me to you, so you can help me by buying the books and discs at cuttingthroughthematrix.com.  And remember from the US, you can still use a personal check to Canada, or you can send cash, or you can send an international postal money order from your post office, or you can use PayPal.  You’ll find the button on the .com site.  Use that, and follow it with an email with name, address, and order.  I’ll get it out to you.  And straight donations, believe you me, are certainly welcome.  And the dollar is still plummeting, of course, during this soap opera, the drama, which is all dragged on really for your benefit, not for the politicians, to make you breathe a sigh of relief when they come up with their big new plan, and the dollar is halved in value.  And from across the world too, remember, you can still order using PayPal.  You can use Western Union or Money Gram.  And once again, straight donations are certainly welcome, because we’re on a roller coaster. 

 

That’s what life is.  It’s a planned roller coaster.  Nothing happens on a massive scale by accident.  There’s no such thing as employing thousands of think tanks across the planet by all your governments, and they didn’t see something coming.  That’s impossible.  They know exactly what’s coming down the road, especially all the manmade things, and inflation, deflation, etc, is all part of it.  But the big, big dramas that they display for the public, as I say, are for the public’s benefit. They must train you that you’re in a massive crisis.  It’s all your fault, remember.  It’s always your fault.  And they’ll have to come up with drastic measures to remedy the situations. It’s astonishing, as you get raped and plundered, over and over and over again, with bankers and utterly corrupt politicians. 

 

I really don’t believe that you could be an honest politician and stay in politics.  You would get set up and removed.  That’s happened in Canada.  Some politicians have actually written books about it after they got out, how they were set up, and how the others would try and coerce them into taking bribes from the lobbyists, just like they were all doing.  And if you don’t fit in, then, of course, they can’t trust you, because you’re honest.  An honest person is therefore untrustworthy, and they have to get rid of you.  It’s a free-for-all in Congress in the US, as the politicians there jack up their salaries with lots of lobbying fees and so on.  Back with more, after this break.

 

Hi folks, we’re back, and we’re Cutting Through the Matrix.  There used to be a program or show on British television called, “Yes, Minister”, and it was a comedy, which parodied what really went on, in a sense, in Parliament, and the bureaucracies that deal with Parliament.  And in one particular episode, they showed you the main minister, who was talking about the incredible spending that they did just hiring ministers.  And they did a survey on it.  So, he said, what did the survey say?  We’ve got to do something about all this debt.  He says, well, our survey said we need a thousand new bureaucrats.  So, they kept adding bureaucrats to their staff.  And, of course, it’s really jobs for the boys, because you don’t realize that bureaucrats in federal positions, and even provincial in Canada and federal in the States, and state legislatures, and so on, they get their families all involved.  It’s really a family thing, a family affair.  And it’s great work, because generally you can never get fired, and you don’t do an awful lot, and someone else always takes the blame for anything going wrong.  But, in the US, of course, we know darn well this soap opera to do with, “is he going to get the cash, isn’t he?  Will America fall?  Will it rise?  Will it fall?  Will it rise?”  It’s like a gun getting pointed at your head all the time with all the blackmail.  There’s something more behind it, as you well know.  There’s something they want to do, and I think this is probably what it is.  It says:

 

Super Congress': Debt Ceiling Negotiators Aim To Create New Legislative Body

 

Debt ceiling negotiators think they've hit on a solution to address the debt ceiling impasse and the public's unwillingness to let go of benefits such as Medicare and Social Security that have been earned over a lifetime of work: Create a new Congress.

 

This "Super Congress," (Alan: They call it.) composed of members of both chambers and both parties, isn't mentioned anywhere in the Constitution, but would be granted extraordinary new powers. Under a plan put forth by Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and his counterpart Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), legislation to lift the debt ceiling would be accompanied by the creation of a 12-member panel made up of 12 lawmakers -- six from each chamber and six from each party.

 

Legislation approved by the Super Congress -- which some on Capitol Hill are calling the "super committee" -- would then be fast-tracked through both chambers, where it couldn't be amended by simple, regular lawmakers, who'd have the ability only to cast an up or down vote. With the weight of both leaderships behind it, a product originated by the Super Congress would have a strong chance of moving through the little Congress and quickly becoming law. A Super Congress would be less accountable than the system that exists today,

 

(A: That’s what the big bankers want.)

 

and would find it easier to strip the public of popular benefits. Negotiators are currently considering cutting the mortgage deduction and tax credits for retirement savings, for instance, extremely popular policies that would be difficult to slice up using the traditional legislative process.

 

So, anyway, I’m sure there’s something to this, and this is probably why they’ve been dragging this out, so that the public will give a sigh of relief when they announce some new highfalutin organization that isn’t supposed to be there at all, but they’ve just made it up, and you’ll breathe a sigh of relief and say, “oh, good.  Thank goodness the money will start flowing again.”  And there’s a lot more to it too, as you well know.  It’s interesting, reading down on it, Obama said America wasn’t a banana republic.  In other words, he should get this extra cash that he’s asking for.  Really, when you look at some of the banana republics, they don’t owe any money, some of them.  And what they do owe is miniscule compared to what the US owes. And by the time the US is finished off – because they’ve still got to fight the war yet with Syria, and then Iran, that’s all part of the New American Century plan that’s still going on with this administration – then America has really had it for the amount of money that they’re owing across the planet to just about everybody there is.  Quite something. 

 

And the corruption too, within the US, it’s a war-making machine, you know, the Congress, when you look at the people and characters involved in it.  And I noticed yesterday, someone sent me an email to do with Feinstein for instance.  You have these lifer politicians.  You know, politics was never meant to be lifers, like it was a trade or an occupation.  It was supposed to be a one-time thing for any person who went into it.  How it’s changed, eh.  It says here, this guy who wrote into me says:

 

For Diane Feinstein to accuse Gaddafi of running Libya poorly, out of favoritism and graft, is simply astonishing.  Gaddafi was the envy of the financial world.

 

(A: And he was, by the way.)

 

No debt, tons of gold, oil, and a massive water project.  The US on the other hand is flat broke and the entire system is run on massive corruption and graft.

 

(A: And that’s true.  It says:)

 

Feinstein is supposedly the fifth wealthiest Senator in the US, and she makes millions and millions off the wars.  Feinstein knows all about graft.  Her billionaire investment banker husband, Richard Bloom, has been investigated for getting enormous no-bid government contracts to do with China and the US military.

 

So, there’s the hypocrisy for you.  And these are the guys who want you to go off and flatten everybody else across the planet, so they can get in there and all their war machinery can get in, and new stuff comes in, and of course, they get the contracts.  There’s corruption for you, as far as I’m concerned.  It’s just astonishing, but it’s so open, really in the US, isn’t it?  Britain is much better at that.  They’ve had hundreds of years of hiding it, behind the House of Lords, so no one knows who’s getting the deals made.  But the US is more open about it.  So, anyway, that’s really what’s happening.  They want a new Super Congress in the US, and they’ll probably deal with the banker boys they borrow from and all the big bondholders.  Quite something else.  I noticed too that the Rothschild family are some of the biggest bondholders for US debt.  They’re buying it up like crazy. 

 

Anyway, I was going to mention too that this New World Order is to take over, remember, I’ve gone through the agenda, everything that you need for survival, personally.  And that’s food, shelter, water, clothing, heat, everything that you need for survival will be run by big international corporations.  And they don’t want you to be independent in any way whatsoever.  Even with the watershed nonsense that came down quite a few years back, when they were going around the country, and Canada too, and around town halls, trying to get everyone to go along with watersheds, meaning that all water that comes down from the sky eventually flows somewhere, so it really wasn’t yours.  And not only that, then the Department of Wateries and Waterways should be in charge of it all, basically.  And if you had a rain barrel outside your door, then really you were stealing somebody else’s water, because that belonged to some corporation, you know.  It’s just astonishing what we put up with, because they use different terminology than straightforward talk, you see.  Now, it says:

 

Citi's Top Economist Says The Water Market Will Soon Eclipse Oil

 

(A: And it is.  It’s going to be one of the biggest markets there is.  It already is, when you’ve got private corporations owning the entire fresh water industry for Europe, for instance.  And it says:)

 

Citi economist Willem Buiter tells clients to invest in the water industry which will soon become hotter than oil (via FT Alphaville):

 

I expect to see in the near future a massive expansion of investment in the water sector, including the production of fresh, clean water from other sources (desalination, purification), storage, shipping and transportation of water. I expect to see pipeline networks that will exceed the capacity of those for oil and gas today.

 

I see fleets of water tankers (single-hulled!) and storage facilities that will dwarf those we currently have for oil, natural gas and LNG. I see new canal systems dug for water transportation, similar in ambition and scale to those currently in progress in China, linking the Yangtze River in the South to the Yellow River in the arid north.

 

(A: And then he goes on to India and other countries, as well.  He says:)

 

Water as an Asset Class

I expect to see a globally integrated market for fresh water within 25 to 30 years.

 

(A: Well, it’s already working right now.  It just hasn’t got the whole world yet.)

 

Once the spot markets for water are integrated, futures markets and other derivative water-based financial instruments — puts, calls, swaps — both exchange-traded and OTC will follow. There will be different grades and types of fresh water, just the way we have light sweet and heavy sour crude oil today. Water as an asset class will, in my view, become eventually the single most important physical-commodity based asset class, dwarfing oil, copper, agricultural commodities and precious metals.

 

So, that’s why the big boys are into globalization as well.  Do you understand, this falls in with Karl Marx.  He talked about this system, where one massive factory in the world somewhere would make all the shoes for the world.  And one other massive factory would make all the refrigerators for instance that you would need.  Whatever you would actually need, one factory would make it.  And at the moment, they’ve based most of it in China, as we well know, and China didn’t pick up on that by its own.  It didn’t even get the cash to start it on its own.  Even their engineers were all trained in the West.  And then, of course, we gave them all of the deals to upload all the factories from the West right across to China through the World Trade Organization that our tax money helped fund.  That was awful nice of us all.  Most folk floated through it, not even knowing that, that they were giving the biggest gifts on the planet to China.  So that the owners could get awfully cheaply made stuff to sell to you at a very high price.  That’s how the world is really planned though. 

 

And I’m also putting up tonight at cuttingthroughthematrix.com, with all these other links, I’ll put up some of the history of the North American Union.  And this was from 2007, but it’s got all the things that have been done up until 2007.  There’s other sites to do with what’s happened since then, because it’s still ongoing, as we integrate the Americas.  And folk don’t even know.  It’s odd too that you can show some people the actual articles from the meetings that they’ve had, these big huge meetings and they still don’t want to believe you.  It’s strange that, isn’t it?  But as soon as someone on mainstream television comes out, a popular face and says the same thing, they’ll suddenly believe it, and you can’t even ask them, well why wouldn’t you believe me?  It’s strange.  It’s something in their head.  They’re trained to believe experts only, or familiar faces.  People in authority, in other words. 

 

And I’ve mentioned before about all my life I’ve heard about the population boomers and the baby boomers that they talked about from the ’50s onwards, basically, and how there was going to be a massive, massive catastrophe down the road when they get old.  And they never explained why there would be a catastrophe when they got old.  It would be very costly etc, but they never said why.  Well, see, they already knew in the ’50s when they were publishing all this stuff.  And they’d already had the international meeting for the United Nations, in Britain, led off by the King of England at the time, right after World War II, that they were going to depopulate the planet.  So, I’ll continue on that theme and tell you how it went from then on.  Back with more, after this break. 

 

Hi folks, we’re back, Cutting Through the Matrix.  Talking about population control.  And, as I say, towards the end of World War II, the bigwigs up there, who, you know, the guys who are our lords and masters, decided there was still too many of us, and that World War II wouldn’t kill enough off.  And so, they had a big meeting in London, and the King was there, and he oversaw it.  And they talked about upcoming baby boomers.  That was their big problem.  You see, what the public didn’t know, but these guys knew, is that they were going to give you a system where they’d encourage promiscuity but no children.  And I’ve mentioned before, from the books of Huxley, Julian Huxley, the first CEO of UNESCO, at the United Nations, where he said that very thing. He said, we’ll create a very promiscuous society, where they can do anything they want, as long as they don’t have children.  And that’s happened, of course.  So, these guys already knew that there were going to be baby boomers with no children to take care of them, in other words, all before it happened.  Amazing, isn’t it?  You think they don’t plan ahead?  Of course they plan ahead.  That’s what the government is there for.  That’s what thousands of bureaucrats are there for.  And they’re not silly buffoons.  They really do look into all this data, and they do work out the future, and they’re pretty accurate. 

 

So, they knew by the end of the ’70s and ’80s that there would be very few children, and that’s why they also knew they’d bring in massive immigration to pay off the national debt.  It was all worked out back during World War II.  Amazing, isn’t it.  Anyway, this article here is about something similar in Australia.  It says:

 

In recent years, there has been intense debate about the population size to which Australia should aim in the 21st century. Some argue for a much lower population than we have now. The environmentalist, Tim Flannery, for example, has suggested that Australians might opt for a future population of between 6 and 12 million people. Others argue for a considerably larger population.

 

And it goes on to the different sides of the whole thing.  And then they go into the demographic reality, etc, etc, etc.  And then how they’d have to bring in immigration, etc, once again, because the people in Australia are losing their fertility it says here.  Like everywhere, else, you know, where civilization comes, something kicks in, and we start changing their clothing, and wearing strange things, and guys don’t really want to get married, and neither do the women either by the way, and there’s no incentive to have children anymore.  You’re told to have fun forever until you’re going along in crutches at the age of 60 still dressing like a youngster.  That’s what they’ve given you as a culture.  And this was all decided a long time ago.  And it ties in with the Council on Foreign Relations that met in Australia in 1937 or ’38 with the Royal Institute of International Affairs, all sponsored by Mr. Rockefeller in the US, and they talked about this whole future world and where they would even bring the immigration from into Australia and into Britain, and they were dead on.  They said they would start with India and Britain and maybe Greece and other countries, for Australia.  And then later on, bring in people from even the African countries into Australia, like a timetable.  And you think you’re just stumbling along down through time.  And yet, non-elected organizations that run your parliaments have already decided before you were even born, how it was all going to go.  But yeah, it’s amazing.  You’re all becoming infertile, but everyone apparently is having a good time.  And apparently, that’s all that really matters, isn’t it?  Having a good time?

 

And I just want to touch tonight too, on all of the incredible criminal laws, really that are happening with more and more government officials, I’ve got different articles on them, just walking out of Parliament in Britain, right into the very groups that lobbied these particular characters in all of the areas that are in vogue now.  And that’s security and security machinery and war-making stuff and so on.  Also, I’m going to put up an article here, to show you at least the stuff that they claim is above board:

 

Ministerial gifts, hospitality, travel and meetings with external organizations in the Ministry of Defence.

 

And it actually names these different ones, and all the gifts they got from all the different countries that are lobbying them, while they were still members of the British service, basically.  It’s not legal to take gifts, supposedly.  I’m sure they all do it, but it’s not supposed to be legal.  If they do it the wise way, they’ll do it like Tony Blair.  You leave office, and then you get rewarded with 24 seats on different boards that you don’t have to attend, and you get a few million pounds right off the bat, because you’ve been an awfully good boy.  But that’s the real world that we do live in.  It’s just astonishing.  And I wanted to touch too on regionalism, just before I go on to callers.

 

Governor Cuomo Launches Long Island Regional Economic Development Council

 

(A: This is a copy of Britain for the regionalism.  I hope you realize that’s what it is.  And it says.)

 

Council Will Drive Local Economic Development and Improve Business Climate Statewide
Long Island Regional Council to be Led by Stuart Rabinowitz & Kevin Law

 

It says here.  So, that’s to kick it off there for New York and it will go across the rest of the US states as well.  It’s pretty well the same as I can see.  That’s building houses, everything, that looks like regionalism and Communitarianism to me, jobs as well.  Jobs for those areas.  So, that’s Communitarianism.  And again, unelected councils.  So, there you are.  That’s pretty well there as well.  Now, there’s callers on the line.  There’s Lucretia from Oregon.  Are you there, Lucretia?

 

Lucretia: I am, Alan.  Thank you.  I wanted to ask you a couple of questions dealing with scalar energy or HAARP, and I guess my first question was that, you know, you mentioned in your incredible books, that are ten times deeper than all the wonderful programs you’ve done. I mean, boy, I just grew so much.  I really encourage everybody that loves you to buy both of your books, they’re amazing.  But you mentioned Nikola Tesla, and you know Nikola is like Nicholas, St. Nick.  What is Tesla?  You said there was something to the last name.  What was that?

 

Alan: Tesla is like the tessellated floor of the Masonic lodge.  Some of them say tesserated, and some say tessellated.  And even Albert Pike argued over it.  It’s to do with the black and the white, the good, the evil, the dark, the light, that’s what it’s really to do with, but hold on, and we’ll come back after this.

 

Alan: Hi folks, we’re back.  This is Cutting Through the Matrix, talking to Lucretia about Nikola Tesla basically.  A mysterious guy that I’m sure, the story we’re given about him is very superficial, obviously, because I really don’t believe that a man comes out of nowhere and just knows exactly what he wants to do, knows it’s going to work, and has to invent a whole bunch of electronic gadgets to make the main gadget.  And so he makes all of these for the first time, all these super capacitors and so on, just to make his main gadget.  And we’ll never even know who, really, I think who he really, really was. 

 

Lucretia: I don’t think so either.  And I heard you on Alex yesterday, saying that maybe they’re a couple of hundred years ahead of us, but I know in your books, you think they’re bringing these technologies back out, you know, that are maybe thousands of years old.  But I guess my question is, I had heard Dr. Judy Wood a number of times.  I actually went to the site, Dr. Judy Wood, and first watched the video with John Hutchinson, and have you met John Hutchinson or talked with him, because he supposedly has reproduced a lot of Nikola Tesla’s items, including floating a seventy-pound cannonball using frequencies that repel.  And make it weightless.  Have you talked with him? 

 

Alan: No, but I’ve seen a bunch of videos from different people across the world, who are into this particular area of science, who have done the same thing. So, it seems to be an old technology.  We forget, for instance, even that one of the favorite hobbies of Benjamin Franklin was playing with electricity.  We tend to think it’s more of a 20th century thing, which it wasn’t.  And Franklin was playing with it, and batteries, and trying to find useful purposes for it, and that was the in-thing in the 1700s, and even before.  So, electricity has been around for a long, long time.  And we’ve got to realize that even the ancient Romans – Benjamin Franklin, you see, if you’re a Mason at that time especially, a Mason longs to be known as a scientist.  That was the in-thing in the 1700s.  So, you had Jefferson who was into inventing things, quite important things.  And of course, Franklin too.  And they eventually put the lightning rod after Franklin, but they borrowed that, because the Romans had lightning rods, and they used to have it on the temple of Jupiter.  And on certain nights, when it was really overcast, like it gets here and very warm, you know there’s a thunderstorm coming, people would flood into the temple to watch the display. And sometimes lightning would strike the rod.  And then the big idol of Jupiter would light up.  And it actually has in the history books at one time, about five or six of these priests were all holding hands and touching the big idol when it got struck by lightning and they all got killed.  So, that was quite a display.  Anyway, so it’s as old as the hills, electricity.  And as I say, there’s no doubt about it.  They have found batteries, legitimate batteries made of clay, and they’ve got lead and copper plates in them, and, just like a modern car battery, add the acid and wire it up and on go the lights.  So they had this.

 

Lucretia: Did you watch the video, it’s called the new Hiroshima, that Dr. Judy Wood?  There’s a number of other buildings that I like had no clue, like three, four and five, or four, five and six, that are totally gone, and there’s sixty-foot holes.  It’s like they evaporated those buildings and literally, the dust floated into the air and away and they literally, everything was removed. 

 

Alan: Well, even the stories have been removed.  I mean, the day that they started bombing Libya, it was as though it had never happened; Japan just disappeared from the news media.  I noticed yesterday, they’re in an awful mess in Japan, and no one is offering them aid.

 

Lucretia: No, I understand that, Alan, but I’m just saying, you know, we heard about towers one, two, and some people heard about seven being demolished or brought down.  But we didn’t hear about like three, four, and five where the buildings are gone.  And even building one and two, you can hear George Stephanopoulos that day saying, God, there’s no building.  And there’s only like two, three inches of dust.  And supposedly the dust went down to one-hundredth of a red blood cell, as far as the size.  There was no dust left.  And cars were either disrupted or turned over, but perfectly fine, paint and everything normal, or they were totally toasted and wasted and rusted, and even anything steel on them was gone. 

 

Alan: Yeah.  I do know that.  The whole thing stunk.

 

Lucretia: There was something in the dust, and there was something that they used, some scalar or whatever, that just literally repelled all particles and they just became dust and then floated up and evaporated.

 

Alan: Well, the technology is certainly there.  And I know that when it happened in the US, with the great bombings that went on there, that the same thing happened there.  Now, personally, I’ve got a different theory on what happened in the US.  I think the first attempt at bombing the towers a few years prior to that.  I do know that the company they got in to try and reinforce any damage and go through the whole buildings for a few years, actually, I think they were the ones who planted all of the special new explosives.  And I think they were done a few years beforehand, and they just sat and waited for the right time and then blew up the buildings when the aircraft approached and went into them.  That’s my opinion, because there’s no way, as I say.  And it goes against all science.  You cannot simply evaporate steel just like that.  It just doesn’t happen.  It was a few months later in fact in Brazil, a plane went into a high-rise there, also made by the same group that built that, that happened to be the Bin Laden group by the way, and the Bush Consortium.  And the plane went into it, there was a fire on one floor, and that’s all that happened.  It didn’t come down and melt and all of that.

 

Lucretia: Well, I’m wondering through the satellites, I know on the illuminati card deck they say the satellites don’t just report the weather, they make the weather.  And John Hutchinson said the satellites are putting out frequencies that are killing the trees.

 

Alan: Well, I don’t know about killing the trees, but the satellites, the Star Wars Program, when it first came out, had a lot of information put in the media at the time, and they did say that these could be arrayed, satellite arrays.  And they could certainly be used for new kinds of particle beam weaponry, to be used on enemies.  So, I’m sure, if we knew what was floating up around space, around here, we wouldn’t sleep at night at all to be honest with you.  It’s that bad, I think.

 

Lucretia: Well, I think that 9/11 was a lot scarier though.  I think it’s way more, it’s far scarier technology than we realize.

 

Alan: They’ll always have way advanced technology.  They’ll show you the latest stealth fighter.  And even when they showed us the first stealth fighter, during the Bosnian War, you look into the records and they actually had it for thirty years prior to that, before we knew about it.  So, it’s the same with everything.  And when they show you the latest one, I’m sure they’ve got a nice little beautiful UFO from Area 51 that probably does a better job of it, that they won’t use just yet.  

 

That’s the world you’re living in.  And during warfare too, it’s the same thing.  The first people who must be told the lies are your own people, “Well, this is the latest gadget we’ve got,” because it’s your own people who start talking and then the enemy find out.  So, you never tell your own people just how far ahead you are.  You never, ever do that.  And they keep us in the dark.  On the weaponry side of things, you don’t even want to go into it, and even into the Jane’s Magazine, the military magazine of all the stuff they’re working on, because you’ll have nightmares, honestly.

 

Lucretia: I hear you.  And I know in your book, you said, Shakespeare said the world is a stage, and they certainly do set up their stages for giving us our reality.

 

Alan: Yes.  Oh, they give us a show.  They give us a show. There’s no doubt about it.  Thanks for calling, and I’ll try and take Larry now, from Louisiana if he’s hanging on there.  Is Larry still there?

 

Larry: Hi, Alan.  You know, with all this shooting going on around, I think it’s well understood that nobody is responsible for your personal safety except for you.  No matter how much you pay the policy enforcement agents.  What is, and you don’t have to answer this if you think I’m getting too personal.  What is your view on the use of a firearm to defend yourself and the lives of your family?

 

Alan: Well, I’ll give you the Canadian perspective first, all right.  The official Canadian perspective is you’re allowed to use just enough force to defend yourself, and your family, but no more than just enough force.  That’s how it is, it’s cloudily worded in other words.  We have had cases in Canada where people have defended themselves from burglars breaking in, and one guy fell down during the burglary, by himself, he wasn’t knocked down, and he cut his legs and he sued the people for having broken glass.  They were working on something inside the house at the time.  So he sued successfully.  They’ve tried to demoralize the people so much by saying, oh, no, no, you can’t do anything.  In other words, in Canada, you can almost legally stand there and allow yourself to be murdered.  That’s a good Canadian.  That’s the definition of a good Canadian.  But obviously, obviously nature being nature, never mind politics and agendas, nature being nature, you should be able to use ultimate force.

 

Larry: Ultimate force.  Now, I heard a doctor, he had a doctorate, and he worked at a, he was one of those bigwig teachers at a Mennonite university saying, oh, he would never use a gun to defend himself.  Now, isn’t it the democracies and the policy enforcement agencies, and things like that, isn’t that what’s come through to disarm the people at large?  He applauded the president up there, I think Norway, because the president said, we’re going to get more democracy and more safety.  In other words, more police.  But isn’t that the exact thing that disarms the people and makes them soft targets.  That guy wasn’t ready to die that day.  He’s not dead.  Okay.  And they’ll be the first ones.  They’re like a burden on society, these people that won’t use firearms.  They’ll be the first ones to call the policy enforcement agent, which is what, 90 minutes away, so the carnage is done before they ever get there. 

 

Alan: The police aren’t really there to save life, you understand.  The police are there to report a crime and arrest someone.  That’s all they come for.  They don’t care who’s right, wrong, or anything else.  They just come to arrest someone for a crime.  It doesn’t matter who it is.  And often it’s the caller actually who gets arrested.  However, you’ve got to look into the United Nations treaty that was signed by the US, Canada, and all the countries, back in the sixties, and it was complete disarmament for a peaceful world.  And in there, it meant complete disarmament.  The US President signed it, Britain, everybody else signed it too.  And it literally meant the only authority that will have the use of ultimate force, that means to kill, will be the United Nations.  That’s the goal we’re heading towards right now, in fact.  And the people themselves will have no right whatsoever even to defend themselves.  That’s basically written into that law, that treaty that was signed at the United Nations.  I’ll try and find that link tonight and put it up on the website, cuttingthroughthematrix.com, but it’s for complete disarmament in a peaceful world.  And the only ones who can use authority or force on behalf of the United Nations are your recognized police forces and so on.  But an individual technically would have to allow themselves to be murdered, or at least fight back with maybe matchsticks or something, I don’t know, if you’re allowed to have matches, or maybe a club.  But if you hurt that person, believe you me, even if they come into your home in the middle of the night and raped your children, if you hurt them, the laws, literally, they’ll spend about two months in court trying to figure out just how much force you used to try and save yourself and your family and decide if it was too much, or whatever.  That’s how crazy it is now. 

 

It’s to teach, you see, the whole world is being taught a lesson right now, that we’re all at the bottom, at the bottom level, all the junk gene people.  That’s all of us.  We’re not up there, you see, with the multi-billionaires.  We’ll squabble with ourselves anyway.  That’s what they’re taught.  There will always be domestic violence, there will always be different squabbles breaking out, drunks, drugs, that kind of thing, jealousies, neighbors fighting, and that’s the way it’s seen.  They don’t come in and say who’s right and who’s wrong.  They just see a bunch of folk arguing, they’ll arrest the whole lot of them.  That’s all they care about now.  And they take that now as part of their training.  That’s a normal given for them.  However, in the end, when it comes to deadly force, the United Nations is to be the only one eventually allowed to use it.

 

Larry: Well, that really is just a complete form of insanity.  And if you do not meet deadly force with deadly force, that is firearm against firearm, and your family’s blood comes running on the ground, then it is on your hands. 

 

Alan: Well, technically, I don’t think you could even live with yourself, could you?  You know, you couldn’t live with yourself knowing that you did nothing.

 

Larry: Exactly.  Thank you, Alan.  Appreciate your program.

 

Alan: And thanks for calling.  And now there’s Bob from Texas there.  Are you there, Bob?

 

Bob: Hello.  Hello, Alan.  Thank you for taking my call.  I have a quick couple of questions.  I’ve been reading, since we’re nose-diving into Communism, I got a book on quotations from Chairman Mao Tse Tung.  Interesting, I got it, happened to get it at a used bookstore.  But it’s so prophetic.  You know, I’m sitting here, and it’s like I can, and then I also got Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, the Communist Manifesto, and it’s you know, it’s like a checklist.  You can just check off everything that’s happening, to where we are becoming, or actually we are, in some very, you know, initial stages of Marxism.

 

Alan: Oh, you’re beyond that. 

 

Bob: And then I was wondering too, what are we to do with this?  You know, you know about this.  I am, what I’m doing is I’m writing all this stuff down, and I’m putting in things that are happening today, to kind of show people, look, this is what’s happening.  I’m doing this at work.  You know, and I don’t care if they think I’m a nut, or whatever.  And also there was a thing in here, and you know, you being in Canada, there was something, Norman Bethune.  I mean, Mao praised him, but then, you know, he was like the author or the pusher of Socialized medicine for Canada, and kind of lauded as the hero, but then he wound up dying, they said he died of blood poisoning by operating on troops and so forth, but I kind of wonder if he didn’t start seeing some things, you know, because the author of this book was killed in a weird plane crash.  Do you see what I’m saying?  It’s like once they come into some sort of truth, all of a sudden they die.

 

Alan: Well, Norman Bethune was the great hero, they say, of Canada, who went off to help the Communists.  And they have statues of him in Toronto parks alongside Mao Tse Tung and different Chinese leaders, literally, in Canada.  And they went up.  All these statues went up in the time of Pierre Trudeau who was a Prime Minister here, who also was a Communist, but he ran under the Liberal; like Khrushchev said, they don’t call them Communists in this country, here we call them Liberal.  And he was a Communist, because he was a young Communist leader for the Comintern for Canada, and Trudeau led the Canadian delegation over to Moscow in 1952.  Every newspaper knew that at the time, but when Trudeau ran for office, none of them happened to mention that fact.  So, up went all the statues to the Communists across Canada.

 

Bob: You know Mao, he said, in memory of Norman Bethune, December 21, 1939: What kind of spirit is this that makes a foreigner selflessly adopt the cause of the Chinese people’s liberation for his own?

 

Alan: That’s correct. 

 

Bob: I mean, when you read this, this book is incredible.

 

Alan: Yes, another one is a book called, You Can Trust the Communists.  Read that one too.  You Can Trust the Communists.  Very interesting.

 

Bob: Thanks a lot, Alan.

 

Alan: Back after this.

 

Hi folks, we’re back, Cutting Through the Matrix.  And there’s Frank now.  Is Frank there?  Hello?  Is Frank there?

 

Frank: Can you shed any light on the significance of the name Ford, as far as the Ford Foundation and the different fronts and whatnot that are always mentioned.  I’m always hearing about the Ford Foundations are sponsoring this and that, internationally and in the United States.  And I’m not talking about the modeling agency or the Ford Motor Company.  But is there not some significance to the Ford Foundation?

 

Alan: Yes.  I think the Ford Foundation, it still goes under the Ford Foundation, but I think the same board that runs the Rockefeller Foundation took it over.  They manage it today. 

 

Frank: Okay.  I was just wondering where the name Ford came from.  I was assuming that was not Henry Ford.

 

Alan: I’m not sure if it was, but it was definitely made up, I think, after he died, regardless.  And it might have been, and taken over eventually, because all of these multi-millionaires set up foundations for charitable purposes, supposedly, which is a sort of tax write-off for them.  And that was the reason they started them off.  However, I do know that the Ford was taken over by the same board members ultimately as the Rockefeller Foundation.  Some of them also sit on the boards of Carnegie and Guggenheim Foundations as well. 

 

Frank: Okay.  Okay, thank you, Alan. 

 

Alan: Yeah, thanks for calling.

 

And it’s really strange, that, that you’ll have the same people chair-hopping from one board to the other, but it’s really the same people doing a round in charge of billions and billions of dollars and funding nongovernmental organizations that end up lobbying government and this is really what they now call democracy, those with the biggest lobbying groups that appear to come from the populace, are really funded and run by foundations, which comprise the parallel government, as they say.  Thanks for calling, everybody.  And from Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night, and may your god or your gods go with you.

 

 

Topics of show covered in following links:

US Super-Congress?

Citi Says Water Market will Soon Eclipse Oil

Some History on North American Union

Australia----Population Futures

Ministry of Defence---Report on Gifts Freebie Travel etc.

NY Regionalism

UN Department for Disarmament Affairs

 


Alan's Materials Available for Purchase and Ordering Information:

BOOKS

"Cutting Through"
  Volumes 1, 2, 3

&

"Waiting for the Miracle....."
Also available in Spanish or Portuguese translation: "Esperando el Milagro....." (Español) & "Esperando um Milagre....." (Português)

CDs

Ancient Religions and History MP3 CDs:
Part 1 (1998) and Part 2 (1998-2000)

&

Blurbs and 'Cutting Through the Matrix' Shows on MP3 CDs (Up to 50 Hours per Disc)

DVDs

"Reality Check Part 1"   &   "Reality Check Part 2 - Wisdom, Esoterica and ...TIME"